From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:14:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash_core, vmcoreinfo: Append 'SECTION_SIZE_BITS' to vmcoreinfo Message-Id: <20210608141410.0026a925ba3a609b0dd4e560@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210608142432.GA587883@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20210608103359.84907-1-kernelfans@gmail.com> <20210608142432.GA587883@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Baoquan He Cc: Pingfan Liu , Bhupesh Sharma , Kazuhito Hagio , Dave Young , Boris Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , James Morse , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Anderson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:24:32 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > On 06/08/21 at 06:33am, Pingfan Liu wrote: > > As mentioned in kernel commit 1d50e5d0c505 ("crash_core, vmcoreinfo: > > Append 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo"), SECTION_SIZE_BITS in the > > formula: > > #define SECTIONS_SHIFT (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - SECTION_SIZE_BITS) > > > > Besides SECTIONS_SHIFT, SECTION_SIZE_BITS is also used to calculate > > PAGES_PER_SECTION in makedumpfile just like kernel. > > > > Unfortunately, this arch-dependent macro SECTION_SIZE_BITS changes, e.g. > > recently in kernel commit f0b13ee23241 ("arm64/sparsemem: reduce > > SECTION_SIZE_BITS"). But user space wants a stable interface to get this > > info. Such info is impossible to be deduced from a crashdump vmcore. > > Hence append SECTION_SIZE_BITS to vmcoreinfo. > > ... > > Add the discussion of the original thread in kexec ML for reference: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2021-June/022676.html I added a Link: for this. > This looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Baoquan He I'm thinking we should backport this at least to Fixes:f0b13ee23241. But perhaps it's simpler to just backport it as far as possible, so I added a bare cc:stable with no Fixes:. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec