From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mwvn1-00C4l1-A9 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:35:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:35:19 +0800 From: Baoquan He Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when no managed pages Message-ID: <20211214003519.GA2216@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20211213122712.23805-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20211213130534.af47c7956c219797e6b56687@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211213130534.af47c7956c219797e6b56687@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@lst.de, cl@linux.com, John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org On 12/13/21 at 01:05pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:27:07 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > > > Background information can be checked in cover letter of v2 RESEND POST > > as below: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211207030750.30824-1-bhe@redhat.com/T/#u > > Please include all relevant info right here, in the [0/n]. For a > number of reasons, one of which is that the text is more likely to be > up to date as the patchset evolves. > > It's unusual that this patchset has two non-urgent patches and the > final three patches are cc:stable. It makes one worry that patches 3-5 > might have dependencies on 1-2. Also, I'd expect to merge the three > -stable patches during 5.16-rcX which means I have to reorder things, > redo changelogs, update links and blah blah. > > So can I ask that you redo all of this as two patch series? A 3-patch > series which is targeted at -stable, followed by a separate two-patch > series which is targeted at 5.17-rc1. Each series with its own fully > prepared [0/n] cover. Sure, will do. Sorry for the mess. Before the 3-patch series posting, I may need to continue discussing and making clear if the current patch 5/5 is a good fix, or whether we need change to take other solution. So I will take the first two patches out and post them. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec