From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B304C4167B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:57:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2U10ZFTdUhxIKNPcTcAJdIARA4/tFcsG2aOYRNDICXw=; b=r5+MzAesFGbbzw kAjv0agdDM32IShYOXinmeZzlvmm4oBYw8jFlJvN2nTgHGdBquqgpVn33pFNSr4hK5LPsw5y26Cav QPNxlCfA9sbWErucmFyr8zBnyGAjBym4J1SSrslLB0ItLlqs0bWJWEunm8kYS3py68LvuhU1KPXGq 2kfV91MCAJs0OBUDCIute+8fupzI+zycWC/AT0faiH4c0OR2Yng7suEt/7cuLBZjoQXy1U7zv6QH5 +wvhCv3DKI+JIZGAiGsKEcd81uWxxzvR/3fndTYvF1QRNJd3TaRAXy88LMdVch1+ZHrrvf7bNcvMy GSSIyAny/TrZ8T8QPlfg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r8kLV-00BR02-3A; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r8kLT-00BQys-21; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:57:01 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA6C61E45; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59C48C433C9; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:56:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1701363418; bh=jNTamNThZ0rAs2o+KORaTzGsMmcQ2kdIW/zV+pisW9M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ep5mfn6/d/046KNhMrPxYSVs2b/H1SbZQJJM57P3hzC8hmlHC+aL7jEbzQHe/bzLV ZDl9UEr14ekcpfCJk6RDza5apPq9i/1g5VSUREK4wQ/5Ib8LBFZY5NsHmgDKwcsJd5 raSV/4nqny+fZeQRHQXL35saZ9wB+AO2cAuRD2YA= Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:56:57 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Baoquan He Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Vivek Goyal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, eric_devolder@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies Message-Id: <20231130085657.6f7f500cc17b663747e4ee76@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231023110308.1202042-1-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231130_085659_706543_2FB0BD10 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.81 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:03:18 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > > > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, but still get purgatory code built in which is > > > totally useless. > > > > > > Not sure if I think too much over this. > > > > I see your point here, and I would suggest changing the > > CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY symbol to just indicate > > the availability of the purgatory code for the arch, rather > > than actually controlling the code itself. I already mentioned > > this for s390, but riscv would need the same thing on top. > > > > I think the change below should address your concern. > > Since no new comment, do you mind spinning v2 to wrap all these up? This patchset remains in mm-hotfixes-unstable from the previous -rc cycle. Eric, do you have any comments? Arnd, do you plan on a v2? If not, should I merge v1? If so, should I now add cc:stable? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec