From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@kylinos.cn>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump: Defer the insertion of crashkernel resources
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:49:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105084911.b64f43b12b0c7e25436cb093@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231229080213.2622204-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:02:13 +0800 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> wrote:
> In /proc/iomem, sub-regions should be inserted after their parent,
> otherwise the insertion of parent resource fails. But after generic
> crashkernel reservation applied, in both RISC-V and ARM64 (LoongArch
> will also use generic reservation later on), crashkernel resources are
> inserted before their parent, which causes the parent disappear in
> /proc/iomem. So we defer the insertion of crashkernel resources to an
> early_initcall().
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
>
> crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -459,8 +458,19 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel_generic(char *cmdline,
>
> crashk_res.start = crash_base;
> crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res);
> }
> +
> +static __init int insert_crashkernel_resources(void)
> +{
> + if (crashk_res.start < crashk_res.end)
> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res);
> +
> + if (crashk_low_res.start < crashk_low_res.end)
> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(insert_crashkernel_resources);
> #endif
>
> int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_mem *mem, int need_kernel_map,
I'm thinking
Fixes: 0ab97169aa0 ("crash_core: add generic function to do reservation").
Also, is this a regression? Were earlier kernels OK?
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-05 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-29 8:02 [PATCH] kdump: Defer the insertion of crashkernel resources Huacai Chen
2024-01-05 2:53 ` Baoquan He
2024-01-05 16:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-01-06 2:09 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240105084911.b64f43b12b0c7e25436cb093@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox