Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kexec: x86: Include pref_address when looking for a memory hole
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:45:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241115094508.GG1062410@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113154437.2860694-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 05:44:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When the kernel is built relocatable, the starting address can be
> anything above 1Mb on x86. However, the startup_*() entries consider
> that the minumum address for the kernel for the decompression has to
> be at least LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR which is turn the value that is provided
> as pref_address in boot protocol. The boot protocol itself says:
> 
>   This field, if nonzero, represents a preferred load address for the
>   kernel.  A relocating bootloader should attempt to load at this
>   address if possible.
> 
> Besides that the code in the kernel (arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c)
> has these lines (in bzImage64_load() function):
> 
>     if (header->pref_address < MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR)
>         kbuf.buf_min = MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR;
>     else
>         kbuf.buf_min = header->pref_address;
> 
> All that said, do the same in kexec tools. Without this patch
> the relocatable kernel may end up in the memory hole that is
> not enough for in-place decompression and Bad Things will happen
> as it's proven on Intel Merrifield, that has a reserved memory
> block starting at 64Mb.
> 
> Note, it doesn't mean that kernel has no issues itself in this particular
> stage, but at least we may work around some corner cases for kexec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thanks Andy, applied.


      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13 15:44 [PATCH v1 1/1] kexec: x86: Include pref_address when looking for a memory hole Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-15  9:45 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241115094508.GG1062410@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox