From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6312EC282D0 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:53:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:To:From: Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DOZ+8wmkawd83rJK0gEScZPK76Inndki3s+Qh46ktp8=; b=j08JOxHpVskTJKc7YHN+OEwP08 n7gMhVW5Li81njOo10kCR8Pw4++xE6AWgidFLFMKpLIqhDWnyOy98RnFBZy+P6dSparqBIYt2Ewf2 H/hXO0DMhCBPtkVMsVg3n24uk5G7fdz+zXDj/7JpCO/JFX/z87ggEn+OsrVsBS/17PThzagDII6TF b/zCtv5BRB1Fd7PqmUcvPXSRIuhuiMIjD9XAQThU/3fu0joTSzc7Hp8eycmoA6Ds2B1Ge1T0xaKp8 +MsmqUzAFNE72brusO7mt8aQMMyjRvDQQ35OLg/QUZ1vs8m+UmoRpHSBMaMDanZj6AHU+K2CdVfp5 J8v8EI9A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpc4q-00000006ZKc-3dNQ; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:53:32 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpc4o-00000006ZJm-0KWw for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:53:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AD2A46021; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 515A5C4CEE5; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:53:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1741132408; bh=q4ihMWeSDYGy90QmpRS0XEWYMYyxawUw1y5E7gZ+Sa8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wNRQrFVyFEe0fO6KvuTU05ovjEYjylU6yNMdXwoT+vAT1RwAeJwXDigVUNNXusFvB vbifi5NzMjDZmdMxGVi6hlYr6QwGft/wuXUkjyqoE5jKIt5NwHmfPYOnG1N2zcC3aP T86iJXnZMZq3K8txWYo6bmX1mK0QiOxhTGaXWyW4= Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:53:27 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Baoquan He , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , ebiederm@xmission.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Yan Zhao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Accept unaccepted kexec segments' destination addresses Message-Id: <20250304155327.4499dcbbfa2445f76927c6c3@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20250304154353.a79c330bffb4d21dce2dad9c@linux-foundation.org> References: <20241213094930.748-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> <20250304154353.a79c330bffb4d21dce2dad9c@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250304_155330_191651_41995085 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.69 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 15:43:53 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:12:27 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > > > On 01/13/25 at 12:01pm, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:49:30PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > This is a repost of the patch "kexec_core: Accept unaccepted kexec > > > > destination addresses" [1], rebased to v6.13-rc2. > > > > > > Can we get this patch applied? > > > > This looks good to me. In v1, we have analyzed all other possible > > solutions, however change in this patch seems the simplest and most > > accepatable one. > > > > If Eric has no objection, maybe Andrew can help pick this into his tree. > > OK, but that patch is the only thing in the world which is older than me. > > Yan, can you please refresh, retest and resend? > > Also, please consolidate the changelogging into a single email - > a single-patch series with a coverletter is just weird. > > Putting the [0/n] info into the singleton patch's changelog is more > reader-friendly, and that's what counts, no? Oh, I remember this patch. Eric, your feedback has been unusably-by-me enigmatic :( In fact the whole multi-month review discussion has been quite indecisive. Yan, please go back through the discussion and incorporate reviewer feedback into the changelogs: describe the possible issues which people have raised and your responses to those. Then resend and then let us restart the review process. With less reviewer latency please!