From: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
To: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ananth@in.ibm.com, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, LChouinard@s2sys.com,
tachibana@mxm.nes.nec.co.jp, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
buendgen@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] makedumpfile security key filtering with eppic
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:21:40 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <229199866.31780089.1352924500787.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A3CFAD.6090008@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On 2012-11-14 20:24, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:07:52PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> >> makedumpfile security key filtering enhancement - Add Eppic language
> >> support (formerly known as SIAL) to specify rules to scrub data in a
> >> dumpfile. Eppic was previously part of crash source code repository.
> >>
> >> The following series of patches enhance the makedumpfile to provide
> >> a more powerful way to specify rules and commands to traverse and
> >> erase complex data structures in a dump file by integrating Embeddable
> >> Pre-Processor and Interpreter for C (eppic).
> >
> > Hi Aravinda,
> >
> > Had few questions.
> >
> > - Which file will contain all the rules?
>
>
> As of now rule files will not be provided by makedumpfile. However,
> writing a rule file is very easy - it is a C program.
>
> >
> > - What's the memory footprint of libeppic.a? Looks like this will be
> > linked statically with makedumpfile, and how much is the size bloat of
> > makedumpfile.
>
>
> Memory footprint of libeppic.a is around 1MB. Yes, this will be
> statically linked to makedumpfile. Users should specify EPPIC=on while
> building the makedumpfile and hence linking libeppic.a is optional
>
> >
> > - Is this supposed to work from kdump initramfs or it is supposed to be
> > used on already saved dump (later during post processing).
>
>
> For the time being, it is only during post processing.
By post-processing, I understand you to say that the system would be
configured to do a full ELF vmcore dump, save it somewhere, and then
somebody would do the post-processing at a later time?
Or is it possible to run makedumpfile again on a compressed kdump that
was previously created at dump-time?
> >
> > Given the fact that it does not reduce the size of core file
> > significantly, I would think that it is better to post process vmcore
> > to wipe out some symbols.
>
>
> The main intention is to remove confidential information from the dump
> file, like ssh keys etc., which could be just few bytes, hence, may not
> reduce the size of the dump significantly.
So this would require you to first do a crash analysis on the unfiltered dumpfile,
find out what you want to filter, write a script, and then run makedumpfile
on the vmcore, correct?
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 13:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] makedumpfile security key filtering with eppic Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] Initialize and setup eppic Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-15 16:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-16 9:43 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] makedumpfile and eppic interface layer Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] Eppic call back functions to query a dump image Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] Implement apigetctype call back function Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] Implement apimember and apigetrtype call back functions Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] Extend eppic built-in functions to include memset function Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-08 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Support fully typed symbol access mode Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-14 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] makedumpfile security key filtering with eppic Atsushi Kumagai
2012-11-14 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-14 17:06 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-14 17:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-15 12:50 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-15 14:27 ` Dave Anderson
2012-11-15 15:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-16 9:52 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-16 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-20 9:47 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-11-21 7:19 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-21 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-22 17:14 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-26 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-03 6:02 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-12-03 13:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-03 14:35 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-12-03 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-04 8:36 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-12-04 8:56 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-12-06 15:26 ` Dave Anderson
2012-12-07 6:05 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-12-07 13:46 ` Luc Chouinard
2012-12-07 21:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-10 7:32 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-12-10 11:35 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-16 9:49 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-15 15:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-16 11:10 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-16 14:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-14 20:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-15 12:55 ` Aravinda Prasad
2012-11-14 20:21 ` Dave Anderson [this message]
2012-11-15 13:27 ` Aravinda Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=229199866.31780089.1352924500787.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=LChouinard@s2sys.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tachibana@mxm.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox