From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEFECD98C5 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:36:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=cDQl2CdnCKUlGD5Y3m+XknlMSQ4t3ZOu9XY596LCP8U=; b=tGQWtWXK4ao/CWd2bYCt1M5RKe FR+eCLESMJNn9asZo4Nb2CaiFKlJEsot1HsCVjXDVBcQyEOsblRR71YSCPyn/wnZiB0RyrwzUAbYl 5m8HsBvl5M+3hl+rcRCU/eD19J8nLmGoIWsITfAig/nU4xyhq+PWJWTByKfjntDQG2ehJIWjoENZB 1jcy82S0BsxMHT8ffsFpmDgs6EKf4bFaCpnwAmdLO5jqO2d6INQd2u4ly4LdCIZOZUxhJpdfZEnJ+ 6AMlphvmF1QX+NPb/00v9bddXW3IxZSKiYZPij7yXZWGiZxP+cLN9luaiL8E9B9u/ZuIglZeFkgOR pO60dHtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wZ7Ts-0000000EJat-2vSe; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:36:00 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wZ7Tq-0000000EJaR-45kN for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:35:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684C443A2B; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CE3D1F000E9; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:35:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781530558; bh=cDQl2CdnCKUlGD5Y3m+XknlMSQ4t3ZOu9XY596LCP8U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AVUPb1iZFIzlr94cutftrVzRuG+IhJjswnuPR5cCBsI3diuTaEDZwGCwcZep8JHSB VPCLmHQhUVmJARc3KHPu4Ygkcxatg3qRFYWSMmup4XlCTE3ixo/l3kH/GWJgTFDTQG lDn/F4kg81MgVkEa/JEeNW9kwo7QmKxioKTLK9hmUyXFmjnOPQfXbfB/5Ib7+wEUkt KBKfea9S4jt5POYuciDLjzZdU5NnVOA22dUFbr0EQ5PptZeMR6C9NrbXyfItmrWWuf Xv9oG1tV0NdCmxZltvSBBP/UhQeKAP30z3ys+HDpUGgnU9SPOq6ajyO6Nq40dSdwYu bRyG5A/AiRLfw== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Pasha Tatashin , Alexander Graf , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Jason Miu , Jork Loeser , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/18] memblock: allow calculating reserved size by flags In-Reply-To: <178143855122.2123877.17100233420255303699.b4-review@b4> (Mike Rapoport's message of "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 15:02:31 +0300") References: <20260605183501.3884950-1-pratyush@kernel.org> <20260605183501.3884950-18-pratyush@kernel.org> <178143855122.2123877.17100233420255303699.b4-review@b4> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzldcgorid.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jun 14 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:34:50 +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h >> index b3b4a6145fad..a3b57066611d 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h >> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h >> @@ -487,7 +487,8 @@ static inline __init_memblock bool memblock_bottom_up(void) >> >> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_mem_size(void); >> phys_addr_t memblock_reserved_size(void); >> -phys_addr_t memblock_reserved_kern_size(phys_addr_t limit, int nid); >> +phys_addr_t memblock_reserved_size_flags(phys_addr_t limit, int nid, >> + enum memblock_flags flags); > > Ugh, I'd hate memblock_reserved_hugetlb_size() less ;-) Sure, will do. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav