From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50CBCD37B5 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:05:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KlgXK9fh/c6tJ8MpzfSz/1fsc65vT6RTYi2FsbqUuhk=; b=Sk7sS3Evxe/UiHHcLORgKXQ9ag akpq/BTAbtTE5EQktU9vWbQ+UnJKvd6E4q2wKTJJXjFMtHI5T9aGFMZWlk+NQd150fwg1QtO5kTFr /spfHFhB8QMGLmeE96ZaiKl6/DChQQPZY97UdxTnvBfRVU6206LTz3kNOqSng95aFuV5L5bGaOh1H W+f3mwk6kcIE+iLJIOkktkkbcRljmWMxKF2Ye9BT4ROdUt0btM2N0xCF9zIudgHkzQp31TLgBwjXt TCUenHV7fe4WALRgMEEhDfcH4t5P/nPgjUgnYL+Bgc676Jp3aOlaPr/bTNiuOFepxQgaMJM0qeQbp DAMucHmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMORz-0000000DDuq-2i3y; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:05:27 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wMORy-0000000DDuD-0cYs for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:05:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257B600CB; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15789C2BCB0; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:05:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778497525; bh=BztAq8w5VK1b2+D1NkvixBxhvrkj9m6ZLycQeOZt3oo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=AFb7kFFrakJ+O+jIq9DJ95cMQOTl61XQ/4sHtzYYZqyQCviZDiQzLDqgQt7e27XuY iC+uHAtm/SC2kbJmzJYRtHLEjiTxtZgqKN7wf7rNoS8P6cRmII+qOOe6ZsM+XQ9uTg A//Z5SCKYxT6VT8GnUl/0o5bKJOax0kxZEKZjVHn8W6q672EhOPi/KOCHWElpDSXHs Cg3LvoQ7KrKXB4aJKttls3nJL7CcRSWeo4qhPcQU9hC75d12Ph3VvqG+D3QwcEujum cCTvbypIMDtzDOO/tsg8TjldwDHZOF1M89vfkGRvYtL/RRZD+nqbraI2wrD889SpVK 4+AfaswtV6ZqQ== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Jork Loeser Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Mike Rapoport , Pasha Tatashin , Alexander Graf , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Jason Miu , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] kho: add kho_radix_init_tree() In-Reply-To: (Jork Loeser's message of "Wed, 6 May 2026 03:51:07 -0700 (PDT)") References: <20260429133928.850721-1-pratyush@kernel.org> <20260429133928.850721-9-pratyush@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:05:21 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzqzniciku.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 06 2026, Jork Loeser wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2026, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > >> From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" >> >> Move the initialization logic of the radix tree into >> kho_radix_init_tree() instead of having users open-code it. Makes the >> boundaries cleaner and reduces code duplication when a new user of the >> radix tree will be added in a future commit. > > Consider using kho_radix_init_tree() in kho_init() as well. This will also > remove the kzalloc() one-off use. Similar for kho_radix_destroy_tree(). Good point. Will do. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav