Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
To: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [makedumpfile] Follow debuginfo link of vmlinux file
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:44:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <465C6667.2020207@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070529204311oomichi@mail.jp.nec.com>

Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> 
> Sorry for the late response.
> 
> 2007/05/24 12:44:26 -0700, Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com> wrote:
>> Bernhard Walle wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> * Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com> [2007-05-24 20:31]:
>>>> The crash utility hides the details of there being a separate debug
>>>> file in the same way the gdb does when working with a binary executable
>>>> that has a separate debuginfo file.  It tries *not* to be ambiguous,
>>>> i.e., the point is to stay true to the "crash vmlinux vmcore" model.
>>> It's documented in the GDB documentation:
>>> http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb_16.html#SEC154
>> Thanks for the pointer, Bernhard. I installed kernel-debuginfo rpm
>> but crash still failed to find the debug information... I had to
>> copy the kernel-<version>.debug to /boot for it to work.
>>
>> So, i think it is a good idea for makedumpfile to follow the same
>> convension as crash and gdb, Ken'ichi?
> 
> No, I don't think it is worthy that a kernel file is specified *only*
> for getting the path to a debuginfo file. It is smart to specify
> a debuginfo file directly.  The crash utility needs both a kernel
> file and a debuginfo file, but makedumpfile needs only a debuginfo
> file as I said.
> 
> BTW, I recommend using a makedumpfile's CONFIGFILE instead of a
> debuginfo file.  If a system has a CONFIGFILE, makedumpfile can
> run without a debuginfo file.  It is smaller than a debuginfo file,
> and it is easy to distribute it to each system.
> I don't think each system should have a debuginfo file, because the
> file is big and a user may analyze a dumpfile on a remote analysis
> system. 

Ohmichi San,

Any way to make kernel debugging easier is great news!!! However...

If i run makedumpfile -x option to produce a dumpfile as below:
 # makedumpfile -c -d 31 -x VMLINUX VMCORE DUMPFILE

The size of these files are:
  16468 -rw-------  1 jlan wheel   16983716 2007-05-29 10:23 DUMPFILE

1719048 -r--------  1 jlan wheel 1760303684 2007-05-24 11:35 VMCORE
  55488 -rwxr-xr-x  1 jlan wheel   56819470 2007-05-24 11:33 VMLINUX

and crash was able to read and analyze the DUMPFILE together with the
VMLINUX.

Now when i used makedumpfile -g option to generate a CONFIGFILE:

 # makedumpfile -g CONFIGFILE -x VMLINUX

the size of CONFIGFILE is only 696 bytes. Besides, makedumpfile
failed to generate a DUMPFILE using the CONFIGFILE:

 # makedumpfile -c -d 31 -i CONFIGFILE VMCORE DUMPFILE
 CONFIGFILE and VMCORE don't match.

 makedumpfile Failed.


I think the CONFIGFILE is too small to be good?

What did i miss here?

Thanks,
 - jay


> 
> 
> Thanks
> Ken'ichi Ohmichi


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-29 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01 13:39 [PATCH] [makedumpfile] Follow debuginfo link of vmlinux file Bernhard Walle
2007-05-24  0:35 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-05-24  6:54   ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-24  7:09     ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-24 17:21   ` Jay Lan
2007-05-24 18:31     ` Dave Anderson
2007-05-24 19:21       ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-24 19:44         ` Jay Lan
2007-05-24 19:54           ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-29 11:43     ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-05-29 17:44       ` Jay Lan [this message]
2007-05-29 18:42         ` Bernhard Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=465C6667.2020207@sgi.com \
    --to=jlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox