From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ikj6G-00008m-3R for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:28:58 +0100 Message-ID: <471F72AD.8030902@ct.jp.nec.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:28:29 -0700 From: Hiroshi Shimamoto MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c References: <47195763.1090803@ct.jp.nec.com> <20071024063434.GC4622@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20071024063434.GC4622@in.ibm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com Cc: hbabu@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Hiroshi Shimamoto , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c. >> There are three patches; >> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 >> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64 >> 3. unify crash_32/64.c >> >> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches. >> >> I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested >> kdump on 64bit. >> > > Hi Hiroshi, > > Thanks for the patches. Can you please also test it on 32bit to make > sure nothing is broken. Okay, I'll test it on 32bit. A build problem already has been found on 32bit. Thanks, Hiroshi _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec