From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.66 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ImecL-0003SI-9V for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:06:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4726753D.3010601@ct.jp.nec.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:05:17 -0700 From: Hiroshi Shimamoto MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert x86: add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 References: <47195763.1090803@ct.jp.nec.com> <47195807.6030809@ct.jp.nec.com> <20071024062933.GA4622@in.ibm.com> <47266132.5050001@ct.jp.nec.com> <20071029161534.6e7f0db6@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <20071029161534.6e7f0db6@laptopd505.fenrus.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com, vgoyal@in.ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" , tglx@linutronix.de Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:39:46 -0700 > Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > >> lapic_shutdown is useless on x86_64. >> > > .... but since the goal is to get apic_32.c and apic_64.c to be more > converging (to the point of becoming the same file)... isn't your patch > going in the opposite direction? > Hmm, I'm not sure that this revert affects x86 unification. Vivek said that probably we don't have to introduce lapic_shutdown() for 64bit. So I submitted this patch which reverts my previous post, it was applied before the comment. Thanks Hiroshi Shimamoto _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec