From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KqQAV-0000PX-B0 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:33:23 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9GAXJHA016304 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:33:19 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9GAXJOp288386 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:33:19 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9GAXJ3q028459 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:33:19 -0400 Message-ID: <48F71868.8000507@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:03:12 +0530 From: Mohan Kumar M MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for relocatable kdump kernel References: <20081012233420.GA6240@in.ibm.com> <18674.42140.69339.584403@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <18674.42140.69339.584403@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Paul Mackerras wrote: > Mohan Kumar M writes: > >> Support for relocatable kdump kernel > >> @@ -1401,9 +1414,21 @@ _STATIC(__after_prom_start) >> beq 9f /* have already put us at zero */ >> li r6,0x100 /* Start offset, the first 0x100 */ >> /* bytes were copied earlier. */ >> -#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP > > What tree is this patch against? No tree that I can find has a line > saying "#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE" at that point. Or is there a > prerequisite patch that I haven't seen yet? Hi Paul, My patch is based on your PATCH 5 of relocatable kernel patchset (which demonstrates kernel can be relocatable). Do I need to resend the patch by generating the diff with your patch5 also? Regards, Mohan. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec