From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164] helo=mail.goop.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1L0Q89-0003iF-Lv for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:32:18 +0000 Message-ID: <491B758E.5090902@goop.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:32:14 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always use 64 bit addresses for the firmware memory map References: <1226519089-21647-1-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de> <491B398C.9090207@goop.org> <491B681B.6040405@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <491B681B.6040405@kernel.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Bernhard Walle , x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> resource_size_t should always be 64-bit on PAE now. >> >> > > Yes, but this would affect non-PAE kernels too. > Yeah, I overlooked the comment about non-PAE. Should we just make resource_size_t 64 bits all the time? Or ignore inaccessible resources? J _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec