From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1L25mD-0002Y6-0R for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:12:33 +0000 Message-ID: <492189C9.2000502@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:12:09 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86: disable virt on kdump and emergency_restart (v3) References: <1226598231-18311-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <491FD283.60402@redhat.com> <20081117150427.GH4481@blackpad> In-Reply-To: <20081117150427.GH4481@blackpad> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Andrew Morton , Zachary Amsden , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Haren Myneni , Simon Horman , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Borzenkov , mingo@redhat.com, Vivek Goyal Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Because of their location, I thought svm.h and vmx.h had KVM-specific > code. Now I've noticed they are independent from KVM. May I move svm.h > and vmx.h to arch/x86/include/asm, then? > Indeed the intent was to have these as hardware descriptions rather than bits of code. So moving them to include/asm makes sense. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec