From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MIdlO-0006wP-3l for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:16:29 +0000 Received: from m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.75]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n5M7GBtx028999 for (envelope-from seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:12 +0900 Received: from smail (m5 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D6E45DE4F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.95]) by m5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDDD45DE51 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3753F1DB805D for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from m106.s.css.fujitsu.com (m106.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.106]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAE2E08009 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:10 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4A3F2FB6.6040901@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:06 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Seto MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT References: <4A39E247.4030908@jp.fujitsu.com> <5AA89A0287224699B8E5C0526CE0EA41@Lanx8664> In-Reply-To: <5AA89A0287224699B8E5C0526CE0EA41@Lanx8664> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jay Lan Cc: "Luck, Tony" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haren Myneni , Vivek Goyal Jay Lan wrote: > Kdump with INIT on IPF worked on SGI's IA64 servers when i left SGI last > December. > Is this problem something new to you after .27? No. This is a potential bug in design, in case of INIT+INIT and panic+INIT. > SGI folks should test this patchset to ensure no surprise is introduced > to their servers. Any tests and comments would be appreciated. Thanks, H.Seto _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec