From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10] helo=mail.zytor.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OeXGz-0002HZ-HX for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:52:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4C51BFA5.60507@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:33 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: In place kexec References: <4C50A7AD.8040902@zytor.com> <20100729134343.GA31490@shamino.rdu.redhat.com> <4C519853.2040206@zytor.com> <20100729150640.GF31490@shamino.rdu.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100729150640.GF31490@shamino.rdu.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Neil Horman Cc: Simon Horman , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , "Eric W. Biederman" On 07/29/2010 08:06 AM, Neil Horman wrote: >> >> Sorry, can we keep the discussions of kexec-on-crash and kexec-in-place >> clearly separated, please? The qla driver issue is supposed to be >> kexec-in-place, and it sounds like you're talking about kexec-on-crash. >> > No, I'm just indicating a difference between the two paths, and I'm doing so > because we used to have simmilar dma problems in the crash path, which we > resolved by not turning of the iommu during shutdown, which is different from > the in-place path. Just trying to give you some thoughts about where to look Fair enough... just wanted to flag this as a problem, because it has already been the source of a lot of confusion. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec