From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10] helo=mail.zytor.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ok3V4-0001Pa-P5 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:17:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4C65D263.6050904@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:51 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode References: <4C65C630.4070008@zytor.com> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D53015B2DAD87@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Takao Indoh , "nhorman@tuxdriver.com" , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "vgoyal@redhat.com" On 08/13/2010 04:11 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > As to Peter's question I did not see any of that code that affected > anything that ia64 used. > I guess my real question was "is this something IA64 could benefit from and/or could we make the IA64 code more similar to the x86 bits"? -hpa _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec