From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SNn2n-0004ah-1N for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:25:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4F9ABA53.2060709@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:25:07 -0400 From: Bouchard Louis MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: makedumpfile availability for x86 3.2 kernels References: <4F99AFB3.3070803@canonical.com> <20120427132448.d7854fd6.kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20120427132448.d7854fd6.kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Atsushi Kumagai Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org Hello Kumagai-san, Le 27/04/2012 00:24, Atsushi Kumagai a =E9crit : > = > Sorry, I haven't tested makedumpfile for 3.2 kernel yet, but I think it = > will work fine. If makedumpfile doesn't work in your environmental, then > would you report it ? = > = > For your information, Suzuki reported that makedumpfile works for 3.2 ker= nel > on ppc32. > = > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2012-February/006022.html > = > = > Thanks > Atsushi Kumagai > = I've located where makedumpfile is being used in our build process and I'll do my best to test it A.S.A.P. I've also filed a bug against it, so you can follow its evolution here : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/988512 Kind regards, ...Louis -- = Louis Bouchard Backline Support Analyst Canonical Ltd Ubuntu support: http://landscape.canonical.com _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec