From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mitchell, Lisa (MCLinux in Fort Collins)" <lisa.mitchell@hp.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:29:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5211831B.6090704@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ob90839p.fsf@xmission.com>
(2013/08/15 4:45), Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com> writes:
>
>> I found a side effect of unsetting BSP flag.
>> It affected system rebooting, once the BSP flags been removed, and issue
>> reboot command, system will hang after message:
>> Restarting system.
>> And have to do a hardware reset to recover it.
>>
>> I have reproduced this problem on the following systems:
>> HP EliteBook 6930p
>> HP Compaq DC7700
>> HP ProLiant DL980 (4 sockets, 40 cores)
>>
>> I have an idea: To avoid such kind of issue, we can unset BSP flag in
>> the first kernel during crash processing, and restore it in the second
>> kernel in the APs initializing.
>
> The premise was clearing BSP would not be an issue. If we could
> reliably count on unsetting the BSP during crash processing we could
> just switch to the BSP and be done totally avoid this problem.
>
> Given that there are reald world issues with clearing the BSP flag,
> I believe the alternate suggestion was to simply never attempt to start
> the bootstrap processor during processor bring up.
>
> If as normal we are running on the bootstrap processor everything will
> work the same, but if we are in the kdump scenario we will be short one
> core. Being short one core seems like a reasonable tradeoff between
> reliability and performance.
>
> Eric
Sorry Eric, I'm not clear to what you mean by ``short one core''...
Which are you suggesting? Disabling BSP if crash happens on AP is reasonable?
Or restricting cpus to a single one only just as the current kdump
configuration is reasonable?
--
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 9:19 [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-06 16:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-07 10:05 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-13 10:55 ` Jingbai Ma
2013-08-14 9:13 ` Jingbai Ma
2013-08-14 19:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19 2:29 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke [this message]
2013-08-19 2:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19 9:13 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 13:46 ` Petr Tesarik
2013-08-20 3:13 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 1:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5211831B.6090704@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox