public inbox for kexec@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mitchell, Lisa (MCLinux in Fort Collins)" <lisa.mitchell@hp.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:29:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5211831B.6090704@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ob90839p.fsf@xmission.com>

(2013/08/15 4:45), Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com> writes:
>
>> I found a side effect of unsetting BSP flag.
>> It affected system rebooting, once the BSP flags been removed, and issue
>> reboot command, system will hang after message:
>> Restarting system.
>> And have to do a hardware reset to recover it.
>>
>> I have reproduced this problem on the following systems:
>> HP EliteBook 6930p
>> HP Compaq DC7700
>> HP ProLiant DL980 (4 sockets, 40 cores)
>>
>> I have an idea: To avoid such kind of issue, we can unset BSP flag in
>> the first kernel during crash processing, and restore it in the second
>> kernel in the APs initializing.
>
> The premise was clearing BSP would not be an issue.  If we could
> reliably count on unsetting the BSP during crash processing we could
> just switch to the BSP and be done totally avoid this problem.
>
> Given that there are reald world issues with clearing the BSP flag,
> I believe the alternate suggestion was to simply never attempt to start
> the bootstrap processor during processor bring up.
>
> If as normal we are running on the bootstrap processor everything will
> work the same, but if we are in the kdump scenario we will be short one
> core.  Being short one core seems like a reasonable tradeoff between
> reliability and performance.
>
> Eric

Sorry Eric, I'm not clear to what you mean by ``short one core''...
Which are you suggesting? Disabling BSP if crash happens on AP is reasonable?
Or restricting cpus to a single one only just as the current kdump
configuration is reasonable?

-- 
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-06  9:19 [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-06 16:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-07 10:05   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-13 10:55 ` Jingbai Ma
2013-08-14  9:13   ` Jingbai Ma
2013-08-14 19:45     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19  2:29       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke [this message]
2013-08-19  2:59         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19  9:13           ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 13:46           ` Petr Tesarik
2013-08-20  3:13             ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19  1:57     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5211831B.6090704@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox