From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VF2gX-0004eS-25 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:54:53 +0000 Message-ID: <521F5297.4070906@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:54:31 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP References: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: <20130829092458.5476.10277.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: HATAYAMA Daisuke Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jingbai.ma@hp.com On 08/29/2013 02:27 AM, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > This is the patch series to address the issue that kdump 2nd kernel > now fails to wake up multiple CPUs. Please explain the "now" in the above sentence. Is this a regression? If so, what is its impact? Is this something that needs to go into 3.11 as a post-rc7 change, which means it better be hyper-critical? -hpa _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec