From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: x86: struct x86_linux_param_header should be packed
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:06:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522849A8.1050802@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130905084820.GB11609@dhcp12-158.nay.redhat.com>
On 09/05/2013 04:48 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
> On 08/05/13 at 01:35pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> I think struct x86_linux_param_header should be packed. Strange that we
>> did not do it so far.
>>
>> Without packing struct size was 3824 (decimal) on my x86_64 machine. With
>> packing it is 3820. I think there was a padding of 4 bytes at the end. So
>> it should be harmless.
>>
>> I tried to introduce more fields and that introduced padding in the
>> middle of structure and kexec stopped working and that's how I got to
>> know that bootparam is not packed.
>
> In this case that's true and x86_linux_param_header should be packed.
>
> One more thing is,
> in include/x86/x86-linux.h, we already define PACKED macro:
> #define PACKED __attribute__((packed))
> But within x86-linux.h, both PACKED_and __attribute__((packed)) are used.
>
> PACKED isn't used much time and __attribute__((packed)) is quite simple
> and straightforward. Maybe it's time we can remove the macro and use
> __attribute__((packed)) directly.
>
> I can send another patch to address this if anyone thinks it's a good
> idea.
Unifying this should be OK, I think.
>
> Thanks
> WANG Chao
>
>> ---
>> include/x86/x86-linux.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: kexec-tools/include/x86/x86-linux.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- kexec-tools.orig/include/x86/x86-linux.h 2013-08-05 13:28:33.999338740 -0400
>> +++ kexec-tools/include/x86/x86-linux.h 2013-08-05 13:28:46.616475104 -0400
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct x86_linux_param_header {
>> struct edd_info eddbuf[EDDMAXNR]; /* 0xd00 */
>> /* 0xeec */
>> #define COMMAND_LINE_SIZE 2048
>> -};
>> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
>>
>> struct x86_linux_faked_param_header {
>> struct x86_linux_param_header hdr; /* 0x00 */
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kexec mailing list
>> kexec@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
--
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 17:35 [PATCH] kexec: x86: struct x86_linux_param_header should be packed Vivek Goyal
2013-09-05 8:48 ` WANG Chao
2013-09-05 9:06 ` Zhang Yanfei [this message]
2013-09-05 14:11 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522849A8.1050802@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox