From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: jerry.hoemann@hp.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bp@alien8.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hpa@linux.intel.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86, apic, kexec: Add disable_cpu_apic kernel parameter
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:05:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526712B2.7070108@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131022220803.GA32387@anatevka.fc.hp.com>
(2013/10/23 7:08), jerry.hoemann@hp.com wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:01:18AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> This patch set is to allow kdump 2nd kernel to wake up multiple CPUs
>> even if 1st kernel crashs on some AP, a continueing work from:
>>
>> [PATCH v3 0/2] x86, apic, kdump: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/16/300.
>>
>> In this version, basic design has changed. Now users need to figure
>> out initial APIC ID of BSP in the 1st kernel and configures kernel
>> parameter for the 2nd kernel manually using disable_cpu_apic kernel
>> parameter to be newly introduced in this patch set. This design is
>> more flexible than the previous version in that we no longer have to
>> rely on ACPI/MP table to get initial APIC ID of BSP.
>>
>> Sorry, this patch set have not include in-source documentation
>> requested by Borislav Petkov yet, but I'll post it later separately,
>> which would be better to focus on documentation reviewing.
>>
>> ChangeLog
>>
>> v3 => v4)
>>
>> - Rebased on top of v3.12-rc6
>>
>> - Basic design has been changed. Now users need to figure out initial
>> APIC ID of BSP in the 1st kernel and configures kernel parameter for
>> the 2nd kernel manually using disable_cpu_apic kernel parameter to
>> be newly introduced in this patch set. This design is more flexible
>> than the previous version in that we no longer have to rely on
>> ACPI/MP table to get initial APIC ID of BSP.
>
>
> Do you literally mean a human at each boot will have to configure
> the kdump configuration files for passing disable_cpu_apic?
> Or do you envision the setting of disable_cpu_apic being put into
> the kdump initialization scripts?
>
> thanks
>
> Jerry
Nearer to the former case, but this is not what a human should do. It's
a cumbersome task. I think, on fedora/RHEL system for example, kdump
service should check at each boot automatically.
--
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-23 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-22 15:01 [PATCH v4 0/3] x86, apic, kexec: Add disable_cpu_apic kernel parameter HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86, apic: Don't count the CPU with BP flag from MP table as booting-up CPU HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-08 16:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 2:52 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-11 16:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-12 0:40 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-12 9:58 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86, apic: Add disable_cpu_apicid kernel parameter HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-22 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] Documentation, x86, apic, kexec: " HATAYAMA Daisuke
[not found] ` <20131022220803.GA32387@anatevka.fc.hp.com>
2013-10-23 0:05 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke [this message]
2013-10-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] x86, apic, kexec: Add disable_cpu_apic " Vivek Goyal
2013-10-24 1:42 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-25 11:05 ` Petr Tesarik
2013-10-29 0:53 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-29 7:39 ` Petr Tesarik
2013-10-24 5:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <20131031005812.GA15459@anatevka.fc.hp.com>
2013-10-31 4:43 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-31 13:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-01 0:31 ` Simon Horman
2013-11-04 7:08 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-29 14:21 ` Baoquan He
2013-10-30 0:44 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-30 6:06 ` Baoquan He
2013-10-30 9:48 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-10-30 15:27 ` Baoquan He
2013-11-08 3:30 ` Baoquan He
2013-11-08 4:13 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
[not found] ` <20131106190232.GA28119@anatevka.fc.hp.com>
2013-11-11 4:49 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526712B2.7070108@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jerry.hoemann@hp.com \
--cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox