From: "Prabhakar K." <krishkar99@yahoo.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: fastboot@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] kexec - 2.6.14 - loads BIOS again
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:48:22 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527147.77305.qm@web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1tyympope.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2119 bytes --]
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] kexec - 2.6.14 - loads BIOS again
To: "Prabhakar K." <krishkar99@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Kexec Mailing List" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>, fastboot@lists.linux-foundation.org
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 6:11 AM
"Prabhakar K." <krishkar99@yahoo.com> writes:
>> Hi - After my previous posting I was able to make some progress.
>>
>> When I do
>>
>> kexec -l vmlinux --append="init 1 root=/dev/hda2" --console-serial
>>
>> and
>> kexec -e,
>>
>> I get message:
>>
>> Starting new kernel
>> I'm in purgatory
>>
>> And after that it still boots from BIOS (to the same first kernel).
>>
>> Whats the problem here?
>
> I would recommend instrumenting up purgatory and then your target kernel.
>
> It is quite possible the problem is in your backport.
>
>>>>>
> I have instrumented the purgatory code. when I run kexec -e, It hangs for a
> while at
> sha256_starts(&ctx); in the function verify_sha256_digest(), and then reboots
> to the first kernel (from BIOS). I have put debug prints in sha256_starts, but
> none of those are executed.
>
> Interestingly, the same function sha256_starts is executed during kexec -l,
> which is called as part of update_purgatory( )( when my_load( ) is called from
> kexec.c).
> so its surprise why the same function is giving problems when kexec -e is run.
Do you by any chance have a watchdog you are not petting?
>> Yes, we do have software watchdog and hardware watchdog. I disabled software watchdog and I think the reason for resetting to the first kernel can be explained due to hardware watchdog kicking in.
To try out a different version of the kexec, I took kexec version 20080227 from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/horms/kexec-tools/and instrumented that code as well. With this, I was able to see the sha 256 verification done during kexec -e and also the post verification of purgatory code. And it hangs there (does not reboot to the first kernel).
So, any conclusions based on these ? Please CC me in reply. Thanks !!
Eric
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3034 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <473364.90108.qm@web65711.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
2009-09-25 22:10 ` [Fastboot] kexec - 2.6.14 - loads BIOS again Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-28 18:43 ` Prabhakar K.
2009-09-29 0:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-29 2:48 ` Prabhakar K. [this message]
2009-09-30 19:03 ` Prabhakar K.
2009-10-01 0:07 ` Prabhakar K.
2009-10-01 0:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-01 21:09 ` Prabhakar K.
2009-10-02 2:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527147.77305.qm@web65705.mail.ac4.yahoo.com \
--to=krishkar99@yahoo.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox