From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from [222.73.24.84] (helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com)
 by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1WAr3w-0001u4-BE
 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:14:01 +0000
Message-ID: <52F18FFA.5060103@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:12:26 +0800
From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: More frequent kexec-tools releases
References: <20140128184042.GA7098@redhat.com>
 <52E85B26.2080203@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140129142311.GA15077@redhat.com>
 <20140131052304.GC25099@verge.net.au> <20140131143047.GA10594@redhat.com>
 <20140204083151.GE30621@verge.net.au> <20140204124148.GH17028@verge.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <20140204124148.GH17028@verge.net.au>
List-Id: <kexec.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/>
List-Post: <mailto:kexec@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "kexec" <kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

On 02/04/2014 08:41 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:31:51PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:30:47AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 02:23:04PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>>> Simon what do you think? A kexec-tools release every 4 months or every
>>>>> 6 months. Does it make sense to you? 
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we could aim for every second kernel release and see how that goes?
>>>
>>> Sounds Good. Kernel releases are roughly 3 months apart. So that would
>>> mean a kexec-tools release roughly around 6 months. This sounds like
>>> a good start.
>>>
>>> So 3.13 was release recently. And last kexec-tools release was in march
>>> 2013. May be it is a good idea to do one release now and then next one
>>> can be after release of kernel 3.15, 3.17 and so on.
>>
>> Yes, I think so too.
> 
> Would any of you object to me doing this with the current state of the
> tree as of fe2c38cc0fc32573 ("Avoid buffer overflow on strncat usage").
> 

NO objection.

Thanks

> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 


-- 
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec