public inbox for kexec@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Cc: "mjg59@srcf.ucam.org" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	bhe@redhat.com, greg@kroah.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, "jkosina@suse.cz" <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	chaowang@redhat.com, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 14:00:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53922C01.4040800@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL01qpsf_-Ae_P-mfmqfu6DYavcb866YUnE4XM_7vdhfcAvMGg@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/06/2014 01:58 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 21:37, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>
>> OK... this is seriously problematic.
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && \
>>         !defined(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED)
>>    /* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above 4g */
>> # define XLF1 XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G
>> #else
>> # define XLF1 0
>> #endif
>>
>> The fact that even compiling with CONFIG_EFI_MIXED disables
>> XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is really not going to fly.  We should expect
>> CONFIG_EFI_MIXED to be the norm, but *also* should expect that there is
>> a legitimate need to load above 4G.
>>
>> Matt, could you explain why this is necessary?  We need to figure out a
>> way around this.
>>
>> My thinking is that disabling this flag is unnecessary, since a 32-bit
>> EFI loader should not load above the 4G mark anyway, but if I'm confused
>> and there is a more fundamental requirement, then we need to consider
>> that more carefully.
> 
> No, your comments are absolutely correct. I was the one who was
> confused. I found this in the git history,
> 
> commit 7d453eee36ae
> Author: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Jan 10 18:52:06 2014 +0000
> 
>     x86/efi: Wire up CONFIG_EFI_MIXED
> 
>     Add the Kconfig option and bump the kernel header version so that boot
>     loaders can check whether the handover code is available if they want.
> 
>     The xloadflags field in the bzImage header is also updated to reflect
>     that the kernel supports both entry points by setting both of
>     XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_32 and XLF_EFI_HANDOVER_64 when CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y.
>     XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is disabled so that the kernel text is
>     guaranteed to be addressable with 32-bits.
> 
> As you've pointed out above, a 32-bit loader is never going to load
> the kernel above 4G, so we don't need to disable it.
> 
> What's the best way to fix this up? Just undo the change from the above commit?
> 

Yes, presumably (as a separate patch since the actual commit is quite
large.)  The patch needs to have a good description why the original
patch was wrong.

	-hpa


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-06 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-03 13:06 [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] bin2c: Move bin2c in scripts/basic Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 16:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 17:13     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] kernel: Build bin2c based on config option CONFIG_BUILD_BIN2C Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-04 18:47     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 20:30       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 14:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 14:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 13:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] kexec: Make kexec_segment user buffer pointer a union Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 10:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] kexec: New syscall kexec_file_load() declaration Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 15:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05  9:56   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-05 15:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 15:22       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  6:34         ` WANG Chao
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] kexec: Implementation of new syscall kexec_file_load Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 11:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-05 20:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  2:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-06 18:02         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-11 14:13           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-11 17:04             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  6:56   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-06 18:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-09  2:11       ` Dave Young
2014-06-09  5:35         ` WANG Chao
2014-06-09 15:41           ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13  7:50             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13  8:00               ` WANG Chao
2014-06-13  8:10                 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13  8:24                   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-13  8:30                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-13 12:49                 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 12:46               ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 15:36                 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 17:38                   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:05                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 20:53                       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:09                         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:25                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 21:43                             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 22:10                               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 22:49                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-09 15:30         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] purgatory/sha256: Provide implementation of sha256 in purgaotory context Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] purgatory: Core purgatory functionality Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05 20:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-06 19:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 10:17       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 17:25         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] kexec: Load and Relocate purgatory at kernel load time Vivek Goyal
2014-06-10 16:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-11 19:24     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-13 16:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry Vivek Goyal
2014-06-15 16:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-15 16:56     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-16 20:06     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 20:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:15         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:27           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-16 21:45             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-24 17:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-24 18:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call Vivek Goyal
2014-06-17 21:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 14:20     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] kexec: Support kexec/kdump on EFI systems Vivek Goyal
2014-06-18 15:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 16:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-18 17:39     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13][V3] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04  9:22   ` WANG Chao
2014-06-04 17:50     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-04 19:39       ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-06-05 14:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  5:45           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-06 18:04             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-05  8:31   ` Dave Young
2014-06-05 15:01     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06  7:37       ` Dave Young
2014-06-06 20:04         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-09  1:57           ` Dave Young
2014-06-06 20:37         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-06 20:58           ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-06 21:00             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-06-06 21:02               ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-12  5:42 ` Dave Young
2014-06-12 12:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-17 14:24   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-18  1:45     ` Dave Young
2014-06-18  1:52       ` Dave Young
2014-06-18 12:40         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-16 21:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-06-17 13:24   ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53922C01.4040800@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox