From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from [59.151.112.132] (helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com)
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1Xidgw-0002Tv-JO
 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:22:11 +0000
Message-ID: <544DE3D5.8020504@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:19:01 +0800
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ilpob3UsIFdlbmppYW4v5ZGo5paH5YmRIg==?=
 <zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] makedumpfile: --split: assign fair I/O workloads
 in appropriate time
References: <1413192866-28140-1-git-send-email-zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE9701D565C0@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE9701D565C0@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
List-Id: <kexec.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/>
List-Post: <mailto:kexec@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: "kexec" <kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>

On 10/17/2014 11:50 AM, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
> Do you have any idea why the time of second pass is much larger when
> the splitblock-size is 2G ? I worry about the scalability.

I think I have made some mistakes during the test.

Thanks
Zhou Wenjian

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec