From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xiopb-000503-GG for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:15:52 +0000 Message-ID: <544E8BB8.8000707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:15:20 -0400 From: Prarit Bhargava MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] kernel, add bug_on_warn References: <1414155207-29839-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <544E8985.50203@akamai.com> In-Reply-To: <544E8985.50203@akamai.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jason Baron Cc: Andi Kleen , Jonathan Corbet , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Rusty Russell , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabian Frederick , isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com On 10/27/2014 02:05 PM, Jason Baron wrote: > Hi Prarit, > > On 10/24/2014 08:53 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to >> cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash >> dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as >> in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the >> user.panic_on_stackoverflow >> >> A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a >> BUG(). This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual >> image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote >> debugging. >> >> This patch adds a bug_on_warn kernel parameter and >> /proc/sys/kernel/bug_on_warn calls BUG() in the warn_slowpath_common() >> path. The function will still print out the location of the warning. >> >> An example of the bug_on_warn output: >> >> The first line below is from the WARN_ON() to output the WARN_ON()'s location. >> After that the new BUG() call is displayed. >> >> WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 3204 at >> /home/rhel7/redhat/debug/dummy-module/dummy-module.c:25 init_dummy+0x28/0x30 >> [dummy_module]() >> bug_on_warn set, calling BUG()... >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> kernel BUG at kernel/panic.c:434! > > Seems reasonable-I'm wondering why you just don't call panic() in this > case. The BUG() call at line '434' doesn't at anything since its just being > called from panic.c. Hmm ... I didn't even think about that. > > So something like 'panic_on_warn' would seem to be more appropriate > in keeping with things like 'panic_on_oops' or 'panic_on_stackoverflow'. I like it a lot better that way too :) I'm changing it to panic_on_warn unless anyone has any strenuous objections. P. > > Thanks, > > -Jason > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec