From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>
Cc: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:25:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CBA252.4050003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501291429001.1597@localhost.localdomain>
On 01/29/2015 05:06 PM, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 29 January 2015 at 02:27, Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +0000, Scot Doyle wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +0000, Scot Doyle wrote:
>>>>>>> When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same
>>>>>>> true for kexec_load? Would it make sense to note this in the man pages
>>>>>>> along with the need for CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, etc? Or as an error message?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm.., I can't see an explicity dependency between RELOCATABLE and
>>>>>> KEXEC. Both KEXEC and KEXEC_FILE should be able to load a kernel
>>>>>> even if it had RELOCATABLE=n.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just that kernel will run from the address it has been built for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Vivek
>>>>>
>>>>> Confusing, right? kexec_file_load returns -ENOEXEC and dmesg says
>>>>> "kexec-bzImage64: XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G is not set." which leads to
>>>>> arch/x86/boot/header.S line 396:
>>>>>
>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
>>>>> /* kernel/boot_param/ramdisk could be loaded above 4g */
>>>>> # define XLF1 XLF_CAN_BE_LOADED_ABOVE_4G
>>>>> #else
>>>>> # define XLF1 0
>>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> Ah, this one. Actually generic kexec file loading implementation does not
>>>> impose this restriction. It is the image specific loader part which
>>>> decides what kind of bzImage it can load.
>>>>
>>>> Current implementation (kexec-bzimage64.c), is only supporting loading
>>>> bzImages which are 64bit and can be loaded above 4G. This simplifies
>>>> the implementation of loader.
>>>>
>>>> But there is nothing which prevents one from implementing other image
>>>> loaders.
>>>>
>>>> So instead of saying that kexec_file_load() depends on CONFIG_RELOCATABLE,
>>>> it might be better to say in man page that currently this system call
>>>> supports only loading a bzImage which is 64bit and which can be loaded
>>>> above 4G too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vivek
>>>
>>> Thanks, I agree, and think it would make sense to list them as part of the
>>> page's ENOEXEC error.
>>
>> Scott, could you then phras a couple of sentences that capture thge
>> details, so I can add it to the ENOEXEC error?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>
> Yes, maybe something like "kernel_fd does not refer to an open file, or
> the file type is not supported. Currently, the file must be a bzImage
> and contain an x86 kernel loadable above 4G in memory (see
> Documentation/x86/boot.txt)."?
>
> boot.txt explains that loading above 4G implies 64-bit and is specified
> via a bit in xloadflags added in Linux 3.8.
Added and pushed. Thanks, Scott.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-09 19:17 Edited kexec_load(2) [kexec_file_load()] man page for review Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-11-11 21:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-07 21:17 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-12 22:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-16 13:30 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-27 8:07 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-27 14:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-28 8:04 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-28 14:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-28 15:49 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-28 20:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-28 21:14 ` Scot Doyle
2015-01-28 21:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-28 22:10 ` Scot Doyle
2015-01-28 22:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-29 1:27 ` Scot Doyle
2015-01-29 5:39 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-29 16:06 ` Scot Doyle
2015-01-30 15:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CBA252.4050003@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml14@scotdoyle.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).