From: Louis Bouchard <louis.bouchard@canonical.com>
To: Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Makedumpfile and kernel support
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:53:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5565942C.5070404@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE9701DB6F8A@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
Hello,
Le 22/05/2015 05:14, Atsushi Kumagai a écrit :
> Hello Louis,
>
>> - From time to time, on the distribution side, we get reports that makedumpfile
>> says the kernel version is not supported with the following message :
>>
>> "The kernel version is not supported.
>> The created dumpfile may be incomplete. "
>>
>> Depending on the kernel and makedumpfile versions, it can be either
>> disregarded or it requires fixing on the distribution. For instance, with
>> Kumagai's help, I backported the required commits so makedumpfile on Jessie
>> (1.5.3) would not complain about Jessie's kernels (3.16).
>>
>> While we can review each patch to identify those who have specific kernel
>> requirements, would it be possible to identify a way to highlight those
>> patches so they become easily identifiable for potential backport ?
>>
>> Maybe something like "[kernel]" in the git log or specific mention in the
>> commit log. I would like to avoid going back to upstream to confirm that the
>> proper patches are being identified.
>>
>> Any comments, toughts, concerns ?
>
> How about inserting a label like "* Required for kernel X.YY"
> into the first line of the commit log ?
>
> It's better if contributors write it by themselves, otherwise
> I'll add it when merging.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Atsushi Kumagai
>
First of all, sorry for the late reply.
I think that this would be a very good solution. I just don't want to impose the
burden on you. So if people provide kernel specific patches, they should
identify to which kernel it relates to as it is proposed above.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng.
Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu developer Debian Maintainer
GPG : 429D 7A3B DD05 B6F8 AF63 B9C4 8B3D 867C 823E 7A61
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 9:23 Makedumpfile and kernel support Louis Bouchard
2015-05-22 3:14 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2015-05-27 9:53 ` Louis Bouchard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5565942C.5070404@canonical.com \
--to=louis.bouchard@canonical.com \
--cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox