From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <565D6A88.10408@arm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 09:38:16 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/16] arm64: Add back cpu_reset routines References: <3279584774ba40f088b79f4df864d69a5b57b516.1448403503.git.geoff@infradead.org> <56586679.8060403@arm.com> <1448913810.31214.61.camel@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1448913810.31214.61.camel@infradead.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Geoff Levand , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Cc: Mark Rutland , AKASHI Takahiro , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org On 30/11/15 20:03, Geoff Levand wrote: Hi Geoff, >>> +.align 5 >> >> Why is this .align directive required? > > In the original proc.S file, this was to align the cpu_reset > routine. It has been there since the initial commit of the > proc.S. I don't think this alignment is needed, but maybe > there is some reason it is there that I am not aware of? None that I can think of, so just drop it - we'll find out pretty quickly if there was an actual requirement. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec