Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Add enable/disable d-cache support for purgatory

[James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>]

Hi Mark,

On 14/12/16 11:37, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:16:17AM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>> On 14/12/16 10:12, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 03:08 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>>>> I would go as far as to generate the page tables at 'kexec -l' time,
>>>>> and only if
>>>>
>>>> Ok..So you mean that I create a new section which will have page table
>>>> entries mapping physicalmemory represented by remaining section, and
>>>> then purgatory can just enable mmu with page table from that section,
>>>> right? Seems doable. can do that.
>>>
>>> I see a problem here. If we create  page table as a new segment then, how can we
>>> verify in purgatory that sha for page table is correct? We need page table
>>> before sha verification start,and we can not rely the page table created by
>>> first kernel until it's sha is verified. So a chicken-egg problem.
>>
>> There is more than one of those! What happens if your sha256 calculation code is
>> corrupted? You have to run it before you know. The same goes for all the
>> purgatory code.
>>
>> This is why I think its better to do this in the kernel before we exit to
>> purgatory, but obviously that doesn't work for kdump.
> 
> I see in an earlier message that the need for sha256 was being discussed
> in another thread. Do either of you happen to have a pointer to that.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg544472.html


Thanks,

James

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec