Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: steven chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	stefanb@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, paul@paul-moore.com, code@tyhicks.com,
	bauermann@kolabnow.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, bhe@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:10:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7903ffe0-75f9-49f8-b638-9a4964897676@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436c898a39a9bdaa2ab24fc111b50d3c885aa028.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On 2/20/2025 4:46 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 14:55 -0800, steven chen wrote:
>> The amount of memory allocated at kexec load, even with the extra memory
>> allocated, might not be large enough for the entire measurement list.  The
>> indeterminate interval between kexec 'load' and 'execute' could exacerbate
>> this problem.
>>
>> Define two new IMA events, 'kexec_load' and 'kexec_execute', to be
>> measured as critical data at kexec 'load' and 'execute' respectively.
>> Report the allocated kexec segment size, IMA binary log size and the
>> runtime measurements count as part of those events.
>>
>> These events, and the values reported through them, serve as markers in
>> the IMA log to verify the IMA events are captured during kexec soft
>> reboot.  The presence of a 'kexec_load' event in between the last two
>> 'boot_aggregate' events in the IMA log implies this is a kexec soft
>> reboot, and not a cold-boot. And the absence of 'kexec_execute' event
>> after kexec soft reboot implies missing events in that window which
>> results in inconsistency with TPM PCR quotes, necessitating a cold boot
>> for a successful remote attestation.
>>
>> The 'kexec_load' event IMA log can be found using the following command:
>> sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements |
>>     grep kexec_load
>>
>> The 'kexec_load' event IMA log can be found using the following command:
> -> kexec_execute
>
>> sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements |
>>     grep kexec_execute
> These critical data events are displayed as hex encoded ascii in the
> ascii_runtime_measurement_list.  Verifying the critical data hash requires calculating the
> hash of the decoded ascii string.  For example:
>
> sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements | grep  kexec_load
> | cut -d' ' -f 6 | xxd -r -p | sha256sum
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>   security/integrity/ima/ima.h       |  6 ++++++
>>   security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c |  5 +++++
>>   3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> index 4428fcf42167..1452c98242a4 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> @@ -240,6 +240,12 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key
>> *key,
>>   				   unsigned long flags, bool create);
>>   #endif
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> +void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name) {}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * The default binary_runtime_measurements list format is defined as the
>>    * platform native format.  The canonical format is defined as little-endian.
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> index 6c8c203ad81e..8d0782e51ffa 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>>   #include "ima.h"
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> +#define IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN 256
>> +
>>   static struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
>>   static void *ima_kexec_buffer;
>>   static size_t kexec_segment_size;
>> @@ -36,6 +38,24 @@ static void ima_free_kexec_file_buf(struct seq_file *sf)
>>   	ima_reset_kexec_file(sf);
>>   }
>>   
>> +void ima_measure_kexec_event(const char *event_name)
>> +{
>> +	char ima_kexec_event[IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN];
>> +	size_t buf_size = 0;
>> +	long len;
>> +
>> +	buf_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
>> +	len = atomic_long_read(&ima_htable.len);
>> +
>> +	scnprintf(ima_kexec_event, IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN,
>> +		  "kexec_segment_size=%lu;ima_binary_runtime_size=%lu;"
>> +		 "ima_runtime_measurements_count=%ld;",
>> +		 kexec_segment_size, buf_size, len);
>> +
>> +	ima_measure_critical_data("ima_kexec", event_name, ima_kexec_event,
>> +				  strlen(ima_kexec_event), false, NULL, 0);
> As previously mentioned, scnprintf() returns the length.  No need to use strlen() here.
>
> Mimi
>
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(size_t segment_size)
>>   {
>>   	/*
>> @@ -58,6 +78,7 @@ static int ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(size_t segment_size)
>>   out:
>>   	ima_kexec_file.read_pos = 0;
>>   	ima_kexec_file.count = sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr);	/* reserved space */
>> +	ima_measure_kexec_event("kexec_load");
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> index 3dfd178d4292..6afb46989cf6 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
>> @@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ static int ima_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>   			       unsigned long action,
>>   			       void *data)
>>   {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> +	if (action == SYS_RESTART && data && !strcmp(data, "kexec reboot"))
>> +		ima_measure_kexec_event("kexec_execute");
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   	ima_measurements_suspend();
>>   
>>   	return NOTIFY_DONE;

Thanks, I will update in next version



      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-21 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-18 22:54 [PATCH v8 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute steven chen
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] ima: define and call ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf steven chen
2025-02-20 14:53   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-20 15:04     ` James Bottomley
2025-02-20 16:23       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-21 21:02         ` steven chen
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] kexec: define functions to map and unmap segments steven chen
2025-02-20  0:53   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-20 17:22   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-21 21:05     ` steven chen
2025-02-24  6:14   ` Baoquan He
2025-02-24 23:05     ` steven chen
2025-02-25  0:18       ` Baoquan He
2025-02-25 18:35         ` steven chen
2025-02-26  0:39           ` Baoquan He
2025-02-27 15:41     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-28  5:03       ` Baoquan He
2025-03-04 16:15         ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] ima: kexec: skip IMA segment validation after kexec soft reboot steven chen
2025-02-21 15:41   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-21 21:06     ` steven chen
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] ima: kexec: define functions to copy IMA log at soft boot steven chen
2025-02-19 15:37   ` Stefan Berger
2025-02-19 19:21     ` steven chen
2025-02-21 19:07   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-21 19:41     ` Stefan Berger
2025-02-18 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] ima: kexec: move IMA log copy from kexec load to execute steven chen
2025-02-19 15:57   ` Stefan Berger
2025-02-19 19:23     ` steven chen
2025-02-20  1:35   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-18 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] ima: make the kexec extra memory configurable steven chen
2025-02-20 21:36   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-18 22:55 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data steven chen
2025-02-19 16:23   ` Stefan Berger
2025-02-19 19:24     ` steven chen
2025-02-21  0:46   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-02-21 21:10     ` steven chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7903ffe0-75f9-49f8-b638-9a4964897676@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=chenste@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox