Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 3/5] powerpc/setup: Handle the case when boot_cpuid greater than nr_cpus
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:56:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8216e3e3-8475-158f-dc79-1b5ba1032150@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009113036.45988-4-piliu@redhat.com>



On 09/10/23 5:00 pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> If the boot_cpuid is smaller than nr_cpus, it requires extra effort to
> ensure the boot_cpu is in cpu_present_mask. This can be achieved by
> reserving the last quota for the boot cpu.
> 
> Note: the restriction on nr_cpus will be lifted with more effort in the
> successive patches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> index 81291e13dec0..f9ef0a2666b0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> @@ -454,8 +454,8 @@ struct interrupt_server_node {
>   void __init smp_setup_cpu_maps(void)
>   {
>   	struct device_node *dn;
> -	int shift = 0, cpu = 0;
> -	int j, nthreads = 1;
> +	int terminate, shift = 0, cpu = 0;
> +	int j, bt_thread = 0, nthreads = 1;
>   	int len;
>   	struct interrupt_server_node *intserv_node, *n;
>   	struct list_head *bt_node, head;
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ void __init smp_setup_cpu_maps(void)
>   			for (j = 0 ; j < nthreads; j++) {
>   				if (be32_to_cpu(intserv[j]) == boot_cpu_hwid) {
>   					bt_node = &intserv_node->node;
> +					bt_thread = j;
>   					found_boot_cpu = true;
>   					/*
>   					 * Record the round-shift between dt
> @@ -537,11 +538,21 @@ void __init smp_setup_cpu_maps(void)
>   	/* Select the primary thread, the boot cpu's slibing, as the logic 0 */
>   	list_add_tail(&head, bt_node);
>   	pr_info("the round shift between dt seq and the cpu logic number: %d\n", shift);
> +	terminate = nr_cpu_ids;
>   	list_for_each_entry(intserv_node, &head, node) {
>   
> +		j = 0;

> +		/* Choose a start point to cover the boot cpu */
> +		if (nr_cpu_ids - 1 < bt_thread) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The processor core puts assumption on the thread id,
> +			 * not to breach the assumption.
> +			 */
> +			terminate = nr_cpu_ids - 1;

nthreads is anyway assumed to be same for all cores. So, enforcing
nr_cpu_ids to a minimum of nthreads (and multiple of nthreads) should
make the code much simpler without the need for above check and the
other complexities addressed in the subsequent patches...

Thanks
Hari

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-10  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09 11:30 [PATCHv8 0/5] enable nr_cpus for powerpc Pingfan Liu
2023-10-09 11:30 ` [PATCHv8 1/5] powerpc/setup : Enable boot_cpu_hwid for PPC32 Pingfan Liu
2023-10-10  4:44   ` Sourabh Jain
2023-10-10  8:24     ` Sourabh Jain
2023-10-10  9:08     ` Sourabh Jain
2023-10-11  2:30       ` Pingfan Liu
2023-10-11 10:53         ` Sourabh Jain
2023-10-12 13:20           ` Pingfan Liu
2023-10-16  6:43             ` Sourabh Jain
2023-10-17  2:12               ` Pingfan Liu
2023-10-09 11:30 ` [PATCHv8 2/5] powerpc/setup: Loosen the mapping between cpu logical id and its seq in dt Pingfan Liu
2023-10-10 10:37   ` Hari Bathini
2023-10-11  3:11     ` Pingfan Liu
2023-10-09 11:30 ` [PATCHv8 3/5] powerpc/setup: Handle the case when boot_cpuid greater than nr_cpus Pingfan Liu
2023-10-10  8:26   ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2023-10-11  3:05     ` Pingfan Liu
2023-10-12  5:32       ` Hari Bathini
2023-10-09 11:30 ` [PATCHv8 4/5] powerpc/cpu: Skip impossible cpu during iteration on a core Pingfan Liu
2023-10-09 11:30 ` [PATCHv8 5/5] powerpc/setup: alloc extra paca_ptrs to hold boot_cpuid Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8216e3e3-8475-158f-dc79-1b5ba1032150@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox