From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Cc: Indranil Choudhury <indranil@chelsio.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ganesh GR <ganeshgr@chelsio.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:28:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sfcy4ge.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180418123114.GA19159@chelsio.com> (Rahul Lakkireddy's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:01:16 +0530")
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com> writes:
> On Wednesday, April 04/18/18, 2018 at 11:45:46 +0530, Dave Young wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> On 04/17/18 at 01:14pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
>> > On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
>> > panic can happen sporadically after days or even months. It is
>> > important to collect as much debug logs as possible to root cause
>> > and fix the problem, that may not be easy to reproduce. Snapshot of
>> > underlying hardware/firmware state (like register dump, firmware
>> > logs, adapter memory, etc.), at the time of kernel panic will be very
>> > helpful while debugging the culprit device driver.
>> >
>> > This series of patches add new generic framework that enable device
>> > drivers to collect device specific snapshot of the hardware/firmware
>> > state of the underlying device in the crash recovery kernel. In crash
>> > recovery kernel, the collected logs are added as elf notes to
>> > /proc/vmcore, which is copied by user space scripts for post-analysis.
>> >
>> > The sequence of actions done by device drivers to append their device
>> > specific hardware/firmware logs to /proc/vmcore are as follows:
>> >
>> > 1. During probe (before hardware is initialized), device drivers
>> > register to the vmcore module (via vmcore_add_device_dump()), with
>> > callback function, along with buffer size and log name needed for
>> > firmware/hardware log collection.
>>
>> I assumed the elf notes info should be prepared while kexec_[file_]load
>> phase. But I did not read the old comment, not sure if it has been discussed
>> or not.
>>
>
> We must not collect dumps in crashing kernel. Adding more things in
> crash dump path risks not collecting vmcore at all. Eric had
> discussed this in more detail at:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/24/319
>
> We are safe to collect dumps in the second kernel. Each device dump
> will be exported as an elf note in /proc/vmcore.
It just occurred to me there is one variation that is worth
considering.
Is the area you are looking at dumping part of a huge mmio area?
I think someone said 2GB?
If that is the case it could be worth it to simply add the needed
addresses to the range of memory we need to dump, and simply having a
elf note saying that is what happened.
>> If do this in 2nd kernel a question is driver can be loaded later than vmcore init.
>
> Yes, drivers will add their device dumps after vmcore init.
>
>> How to guarantee the function works if vmcore reading happens before
>> the driver is loaded?
>>
>> Also it is possible that kdump initramfs does not contains the driver
>> module.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>
> Yes, driver must be in initramfs if it wants to collect and add device
> dump to /proc/vmcore in second kernel.
Eric
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 7:44 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-17 7:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] vmcore: add API to collect hardware dump in second kernel Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-19 8:24 ` Greg KH
2018-04-19 14:56 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-17 7:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] vmcore: append device dumps to vmcore as elf notes Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-17 7:44 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] cxgb4: collect hardware dump in second kernel Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-18 6:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel Dave Young
2018-04-18 12:31 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-18 14:28 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-04-18 15:07 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-19 1:40 ` Dave Young
2018-04-19 14:27 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-19 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-20 13:06 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-04-20 13:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-20 14:51 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sfcy4ge.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
--cc=indranil@chelsio.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
--cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox