Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()

Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-19T19:57:55Z

On 8/19/21 11:33 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> There was some talk about this on the mailing list where TDX and SEV may
> need to be differentiated, so we wanted to reserve a range of values per
> technology. I guess I can remove them until they are actually needed.

In TDX also we have similar requirements and we need some flags for
TDX specific checks. So I think it is fine to leave some space for vendor
flags.

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer