From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D95CE6F08A for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 20:35:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Wvee75DUChxgjy9u8BrChWEKeQ4hBEN+nRwm38CBxoo=; b=mpWu3UJ0Rl2qxY cQMPPF4jVQkTMuHAq+j4nIjbds9VTDsAk1focKKyWrH+OPKui1m98cS7jX+hugaMkqvqafK4gkFrq sDX2+GY0cW2Pe/kkClDTODHsjUMqPlru5NOpKAmRSiUox8kDsdao4NgHCbTYGSc1pJ8WFklwDbJm5 5JQFSktqLavtcNXTqvGlb1PovidnCQoJGLwBFq3WhbPlM0FIWfTyR/zwugljm07v0HNQRVQumCrL4 uYImrF85iblgiFRDJwtPTmqMj8sU7wqeexp0dUwxi6eIkpmLBfVzgoOj4vSvkS4JtdyUpZueL5bci CMsmzoun6gMZfnU+V8CA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t6yN3-00000008Gg5-3wlc; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:35:49 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t6yLj-00000008GLs-3IwT for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:34:31 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1730493266; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=59h/4FnoLZZk0MjKW721si8AWaLkimLKPstUwXjURkM=; b=JeAOcNd9zrq7bXVafXOI2+VYSzyPRw9xhEyPY0SVc0xT2OTXiKahuugI6qbZlJXLpmgXdz S/DifpCHtGqRY77d4wpWjRyJY7j2tylDedWjt65ZEhiNjiZSeEOtRH21gcq9Hk0ZyMrP7G LOIMQhkAxoAsPe8PnwY42kXvpcPVqAZIYgCfLSh6SJfsTQQr/5RAqfl3q2oKQyk4Ltxa7+ OIHZdyKZJnhBvKZQKt2IHL6yOoa9mnTcLfdL4qDvhLoRv6D8u7IaiccpXqnsEbT4G8diNJ n1wYxp5K/qPOc7dJvFwjgG/24Zuj2pRmN+72r0Z/SLTwxo0yreEGuOo062oJ0g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1730493266; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=59h/4FnoLZZk0MjKW721si8AWaLkimLKPstUwXjURkM=; b=veMIp8Hu1Fbb53XXy+Sfvp5sOohtY6hRYmZZOUX8zQcskFrKrTVCheUAX3OX4Z0hp6Iatx V3AWbIBcUUOY/lBA== To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Ross Philipson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: dpsmith@apertussolutions.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ardb@kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, luto@amacapital.net, nivedita@alum.mit.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, corbet@lwn.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/20] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support In-Reply-To: References: <20240913200517.3085794-1-ross.philipson@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 21:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87a5eivgku.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241101_133428_001724_4B8DBA30 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.42 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 12:28, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri Sep 13, 2024 at 11:04 PM EEST, Ross Philipson wrote: >> A quick note on terminology. The larger open source project itself is called >> TrenchBoot, which is hosted on Github (links below). The kernel feature enabling >> the use of Dynamic Launch technology is referred to as "Secure Launch" within >> the kernel code. As such the prefixes sl_/SL_ or slaunch/SLAUNCH will be seen >> in the code. The stub code discussed above is referred to as the SL stub. > > 1. I don't see any tags in most of the patches so don't get the rush. This > includes also patches for x86. Why I would care to review TPM patches > when there is over a dozen unreviewed and untested patches before it? > 2. TPM patches have been in circulation in and out of the patch set > for some time now with little or no improvement. > > Why the sudden buzz? I have not heard much about this since last early > summer. Have to spend some time recalling what this is about anyway. I > cannot trust that my tags make any sense before more reviewed/tested-by > tags before the TPM patches. If I intend to merge the patches then I surely have looked at them deeply. I don't have to send a reviewed-by just to apply them afterwards. There was enough motion on these patches and this posting is in your inbox for 6 weeks now without any reaction from you. The TPM changes are very much independent from the x86 specific ones, so why do you want x86 review tags in order to look at the ones which are specific to your subsystem especially as some of them seem to address real short comings there independent of trenchboot. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec