From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Mitsuhiro Tanino <mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@hitachi.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] Exclude hwpoison page from vmcore dump
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:40:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcdpk3lz.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50924FCD.2020100@hitachi.com> (Mitsuhiro Tanino's message of "Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:32:45 +0900")
Mitsuhiro Tanino <mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@hitachi.com> writes:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> (2012/10/31 23:14), Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> If hwpoision functionality is not available in hardware, then respective
>> bit will not be even set in struct page and it will be saved by default.
>> So it should not matter whether hardware has hwpoision functionality
>> or not.
>
> Thanks, I understand.
>
>> I think that removing hwpoisno pages by default makes sense. If somebody
>> does have a reasonable case of not doing so, then we could either
>> introduce anther filtering level (based on type) or add another command
>> line option like (--no-hwposion-filtering) etc.
>
> I agree with you.
> If somebody requests to support for disabling the filter of hwpoison pages,
> this option will be discussed.
I agree. If we are performing filtering filtering out of poisoned pages
seems very reasonable. So ack on the basic concept.
Eric
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 14:06 [Patch 0/2] Exclude hwpoison page from vmcore dump Mitsuhiro Tanino
2012-10-30 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-10-31 13:51 ` Mitsuhiro Tanino
2012-10-31 14:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-11-01 10:32 ` Mitsuhiro Tanino
2012-11-01 10:40 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-10-31 14:04 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] " Mitsuhiro Tanino
2012-10-31 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] makedumpfile: Add a default action to exclude hwpoison page from vmcore Mitsuhiro Tanino
2012-11-05 6:04 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-10-31 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] kexec: Export PG_hwpoison flag into vmcoreinfo Mitsuhiro Tanino
2013-02-08 8:49 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-02-12 3:07 ` Mitsuhiro Tanino
2013-02-12 10:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-02-12 13:29 ` Mitsuhiro Tanino
2013-02-15 8:48 ` Mitsuhiro Tanino
2013-02-15 9:35 ` Atsushi Kumagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vcdpk3lz.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@hitachi.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox