Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
To: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "prudo@linux.ibm.com" <prudo@linux.ibm.com>,
	"dyoung@redhat.com" <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile/s390: Add get_kaslr_offset() for s390x
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:31:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fd807f1-c296-1a34-e42a-a102df62f3a0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE2DC15AC0B8543882A74EA0D43DBEC03597F4E@BPXM09GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>

Hi,

On 12.12.2019 17:12, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Hello Kazu,
>>
>> I think we can try to generalize the kaslr offset extraction.
>> I won't speak for other architectures, but for s390 that get_kaslr_offset_arm64()
>> should work fine. The only concern of mine is this TODO statement:
>>
>> if (_text <= vaddr && vaddr <= _end) {
>> 	DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n", info->kaslr_offset);
>> 	return info->kaslr_offset;
>> 	} else {
>> 	/*
>> 	* TODO: we need to check if it is vmalloc/vmmemmap/module
>> 	* address, we will have different offset
>> 	*/
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Could you explain this one?
> 
> Probably it was considered that the check would be needed to support
> the whole KASLR behavior when get_kaslr_offset_x86_64() was written
> originally.
> 
> But in the current makedumpfile for x86_64 and arm64 supporting KASLR,
> the offset we need is the one for symbol addresses in vmlinux only.
> As I said below, module symbol addresses are retrieved from vmcore.
> Other addresses should not be passed to the function for now, as far
> as I know.
> 
> So I think the TODO comment is confusing, and it would be better to
> remove it or change it to something like:
> /*
>  * Returns 0 if vaddr does not need the offset to be added,
>  * e.g. for module address.
>  */
> 
> But if s390 uses get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific code to
> adjust addresses other than kernel text address, we might need to
> modify it for s390, not generalize it.

Currently, s390 doesn't use get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific 
code. 

> 
> Thanks,
> Kazu
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mikhail
>>
>> On 09.12.2019 23:02, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
>>> Hi Mikhail,
>>>
>>> Sorry for late reply.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> Since kernel v5.2 KASLR is supported on s390. In makedumpfile however no
>>>> support has been added yet. This patch adds the arch specific function
>>>> get_kaslr_offset() for s390x.
>>>> Since the values in vmcoreinfo are already relocated, the patch is
>>>> mainly relevant for vmlinux processing (-x option).
>>>
>>> In the current implementation of makedumpfile, the get_kaslr_offset(vaddr)
>>> is supposed to return the KASLR offset only when the offset is needed to
>>> add to the vaddr.  So generally symbols from kernel (vmlinux) need it, but
>>> symbols from modules are resolved dynamically and don't need the offset.
>> \>
>>> This patch always returns the offset if any, as a result, I guess this patch
>>> will not work as expected with module symbols in filter config file.
>>>
>>> So... How about making get_kaslr_offset_arm64() general for other archs
>>> (get_kaslr_offset_general() or something), then using it also for s390?
>>> If OK, I can do that generalization.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kazu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/s390x.c   | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  makedumpfile.h |  3 ++-
>>>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390x.c b/arch/s390x.c
>>>> index bf9d58e..892df14 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/s390x.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/s390x.c
>>>> @@ -122,6 +122,38 @@ get_machdep_info_s390x(void)
>>>>  	return TRUE;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +unsigned long
>>>> +get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	unsigned int i;
>>>> +	char buf[BUFSIZE_FGETS], *endp;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!info->file_vmcoreinfo)
>>>> +		return FALSE;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (fseek(info->file_vmcoreinfo, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
>>>> +		ERRMSG("Can't seek the vmcoreinfo file(%s). %s\n",
>>>> +		       info->name_vmcoreinfo, strerror(errno));
>>>> +		return FALSE;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	while (fgets(buf, BUFSIZE_FGETS, info->file_vmcoreinfo)) {
>>>> +		i = strlen(buf);
>>>> +		if (!i)
>>>> +			break;
>>>> +		if (buf[i - 1] == '\n')
>>>> +			buf[i - 1] = '\0';
>>>> +		if (strncmp(buf, STR_KERNELOFFSET,
>>>> +			    strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET)) == 0) {
>>>> +			info->kaslr_offset =
>>>> +				strtoul(buf + strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET), &endp, 16);
>>>> +			DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n", info->kaslr_offset);
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	return info->kaslr_offset;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static int
>>>>  is_vmalloc_addr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
>>>>  {
>>>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
>>>> index ac11e90..26f6247 100644
>>>> --- a/makedumpfile.h
>>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
>>>> @@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_ppc(unsigned long vaddr);
>>>>  int get_machdep_info_s390x(void);
>>>>  unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
>>>>  int is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(unsigned long addr);
>>>> +unsigned long get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
>>>>  #define find_vmemmap()		stub_false()
>>>>  #define get_phys_base()		stub_true()
>>>>  #define get_machdep_info()	get_machdep_info_s390x()
>>>>  #define get_versiondep_info()	stub_true()
>>>> -#define get_kaslr_offset(X)	stub_false()
>>>> +#define get_kaslr_offset(X)	get_kaslr_offset_s390x(X)
>>>>  #define vaddr_to_paddr(X)	vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(X)
>>>>  #define paddr_to_vaddr(X)	paddr_to_vaddr_general(X)
>>>>  #define is_phys_addr(X)		is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(X)
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03 22:27 [PATCH] makedumpfile/s390: Add get_kaslr_offset() for s390x Mikhail Zaslonko
2019-12-09 22:02 ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-12-12  9:50   ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2019-12-12 16:12     ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-12-12 16:31       ` Zaslonko Mikhail [this message]
2019-12-17 17:46         ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-12-26  3:38           ` lijiang
2019-12-26  4:07             ` lijiang
2019-12-27 21:29               ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2019-12-30 10:15                 ` lijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8fd807f1-c296-1a34-e42a-a102df62f3a0@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=prudo@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox