From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
bhsharma@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
dyoung@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/11] arm64: kexec_file: invoke the kernel without purgatory
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 18:46:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c830fe8-56d8-b43a-6265-43d31dffe61a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425062629.29404-4-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Hi Akashi,
On 25/04/18 07:26, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On arm64, purugatory would do almosty nothing. So just invoke secondary
> kernel directy by jumping into its entry code.
(Nits: purgatory, almost, directly)
> While, in this case, cpu_soft_restart() must be called with dtb address
> in the fifth argument, the behavior still stays compatible with kexec_load
> case as long as the argument is null.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> index 8021b46c9743..391df91328ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
> *
> * @el2_switch: Flag to indicate a swich to EL2 is needed.
(Nit: switch)
> * @entry: Location to jump to for soft reset.
> - * arg0: First argument passed to @entry.
> - * arg1: Second argument passed to @entry.
> - * arg2: Third argument passed to @entry.
> + * arg0: First argument passed to @entry. (relocation list)
> + * arg1: Second argument passed to @entry.(physcal kernel entry)
(Nit: physical)
> + * arg2: Third argument passed to @entry. (physical dtb address)
> *
> * Put the CPU into the same state as it would be if it had been reset, and
> * branch to what would be the reset vector. It must be executed with the
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index f76ea92dff91..f7dbba00be10 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,17 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
> * uses physical addressing to relocate the new image to its final
> * position and transfers control to the image entry point when the
> * relocation is complete.
> + * In case of kexec_file_load syscall, we directly start the kernel,
> + * skipping purgatory.
We're not really skipping purgatory, purgatory doesn't exist! For regular kexec
the image/payload we run is up to kexec-tools. For kexec_file_load its a
kernel-image. Purgatory is a kexec-tools-ism.
> cpu_soft_restart(kimage != kexec_crash_image,
> - reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage->start, 0);
> + reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage->start,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
> + kimage->purgatory_info.purgatory_buf ?
> + 0 : kimage->arch.dtb_mem);
> +#else
> + 0);
> +#endif
Where does kimage->arch.dtb_mem come from? This patch won't build until patch 8
adds the config option, which is going to make bisecting any kexec side-effects
tricky.
purgatory_buf seems to only be set in kexec_purgatory_setup_kbuf(), called from
kexec_load_purgatory(), which we don't use. How does this get a value?
Would it be better to always use kimage->arch.dtb_mem, and ensure that is 0 for
regular kexec (as we can't know where the dtb is)? (image_arg may then be a
better name).
Thanks,
James
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 6:26 [PATCH v9 00/11] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] kexec_file: make kexec_image_post_load_cleanup_default() global AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-28 9:45 ` Dave Young
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 4:40 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] arm64: kexec_file: invoke the kernel without purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse [this message]
2018-05-07 5:22 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-11 17:03 ` James Morse
2018-05-15 4:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:15 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 6:22 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] arm64: kexec_file: allocate memory walking through memblock list AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 5:59 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 4:35 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:17 ` James Morse
2018-05-17 2:10 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-17 2:15 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-17 18:04 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 1:37 ` Baoquan He
2018-05-18 5:07 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd and device-tree AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 16:20 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 7:11 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 7:42 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 15:59 ` James Morse
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: kexec_file: allow for loading Image-format kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-01 17:46 ` James Morse
2018-05-07 7:21 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-11 17:07 ` James Morse
2018-05-15 5:13 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:14 ` James Morse
2018-05-21 9:32 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:11 ` James Morse
2018-05-16 8:34 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 9:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-16 10:06 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 9:50 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 10:39 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-18 16:00 ` James Morse
2018-05-21 9:46 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-15 17:12 ` James Morse
2018-05-18 15:35 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-21 10:14 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-05-24 14:25 ` Rob Herring
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] arm64: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] arm64: kexec_file: add kernel signature verification support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-04-25 6:26 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] arm64: kexec_file: add kaslr support AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c830fe8-56d8-b43a-6265-43d31dffe61a@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox