From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05117E6F08E for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:18:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To: From:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=C0gzEgoJe4bYHHFw0o1GTdGMcMEApWHSGCHxcdyl57Y=; b=2goHR+PFRX4+XB uQjgG+2ueGZsqrOy1cUptWQVfdPxBmxqc8ZHxN6qbyxUiFXNnliMf3rYc7f0HyDHkyldYiGRGCpyg oQPviW+2obLELBwAKXIBOFESY/8s8HnXaIZLG8D/NJVWohpky/98CixHaNot1/Xj8fKJw8iapSeAs jIC9mcM8wFdy+1VsulR78SBRnJeZGeLTJkk/TrwQJ7w2CDafIaRKF4wA8vulo+UPzK0smBozKzNdF KZE6d+d0cAlJ6zpSLKNrCyOo5HDomO+wUeb2m9RWPubU8jB3zG4zATfRJGQQSn4bj8XR7rhTD9aGJ h+7pEpNLQT1u26NKd9og==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t6zyi-00000008RyC-1kas; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:18:48 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t6zyf-00000008Rx8-0qTT for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:18:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507545C58DC; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E707C4CECD; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:18:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730499523; bh=SfvWv72ZbUeIjpMhK1H+Di14U2NJnni6MvQ7OWwTfDo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G8B5FbihtNvVjmiGncdZkw/5g49VXEDLWU6dCd6f7AgBZV7b3MDz4Mio9teMOIupZ ARqPuoMHB79uUnWfl+rqF4KTcZ/gObfhf3oVmSS9eCRk0qutPaqPxfYhbHSu3Vq/je HAnbzuzI/c9euOqXkGM4iUaORjvXEUct9BNxVVJk/Pbc72JYcDPtDceTthEVk9fecj /Eb+mS/2aEEzZIyWFJQYVe4M7FITlC7FUxUCj5mBCz6yf4dfV6rgbJW7pxdd+uGM6c HQnGDrwoQ/wXmcgGWjGK7qycALq7sacle8cuCNP5D38T9ddXyPOhWhHpmJw1iV1I20 ayJ6MSw0pdYXA== Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 00:18:39 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Thomas Gleixner" , "Ross Philipson" , , , , , , , , Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/20] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2 References: <20240913200517.3085794-1-ross.philipson@oracle.com> <87a5eivgku.ffs@tglx> <87msiitxto.ffs@tglx> In-Reply-To: <87msiitxto.ffs@tglx> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241101_151845_300488_F4915188 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.46 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat Nov 2, 2024 at 12:04 AM EET, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 23:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri Nov 1, 2024 at 11:13 PM EET, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I think we can sort them out independently as long as we find a > >> conclusion how to address locality change. > > > > And to be fair: there was no reaction from anyone. It is mostly x86 > > patch set, meaning that I was waiting for some reaction first from that > > side. And I did respond to that when it came. > > The x86 side is mostly self contained, so the damage there is minimal, > but the TPM parts are changing the generic operations and the x86 parts > depend on them. > > So let's not create a chicken and egg problem and solve the TPM parts, > which at my cursory glance are partially legitimate fixes, independent > of the actual trenchboot x86 functionality. Yeah, I'm already writing a (draft/RFC) patch to demonstrate my proposal that I sent so all good. > > Thanks, > > tglx BR, Jarkko _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec