From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] notifier/panic: Introduce panic_notifier_filter
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 14:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdgtNvd68kWakErr@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106200007.112357-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:00:07PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The kernel notifier infrastructure allows function callbacks to be
> added in multiple lists, which are then called in the proper time,
> like in a reboot or panic event. The panic_notifier_list specifically
> contains the callbacks that are executed during a panic event. As any
> other notifier list, the panic one has no filtering and all functions
> previously registered are executed.
>
> The kdump infrastructure, on the other hand, enables users to set
> a crash kernel that is kexec'ed in a panic event, and vmcore/logs
> are collected in such crash kernel. When kdump is set, by default
> the panic notifiers are ignored - the kexec jumps to the crash kernel
> before the list is checked and callbacks executed.
>
> There are some cases though in which kdump users might want to
> allow panic notifier callbacks to execute _before_ the kexec to
> the crash kernel, for a variety of reasons - for example, users
> may think kexec is very prone to fail and want to give a chance
> to kmsg dumpers to run (and save logs using pstore), or maybe
> some panic notifier is required to properly quiesce some hardware
> that must be used to the crash kernel. For these cases, we have
> the kernel parameter "crash_kexec_post_notifiers".
>
> But there's a problem: currently it's an "all-or-nothing" situation,
> the kdump user choice is either to execute all panic notifiers or
> none of them. Given that panic notifiers may increase the risk of a
> kdump failure, this is a tough decision and may affect the debug of
> hard to reproduce bugs, if for some reason the user choice is to
> enable panic notifiers, but kdump then fails.
>
> So, this patch aims to ease this decision: we hereby introduce a filter
> for the panic notifier list, in which users may select specifically
> which callbacks they wish to run, allowing a safer kdump. The allowlist
> should be provided using the parameter "panic_notifier_filter=a,b,..."
> where a, b are valid callback names. Invalid symbols are discarded.
>
> Currently up to 16 symbols may be passed in this list, we consider
> that this numbers allows enough flexibility (and no matter what
> architecture is used, at most 30 panic callbacks are registered).
> In an experiment using a qemu x86 virtual machine, by default only
> six callbacks are registered in the panic notifier list.
> Once a valid callback name is provided in the list, such function
> is allowed to be registered/unregistered in the panic_notifier_list;
> all other panic callbacks are ignored. Notice that this filter is
> only for the panic notifiers and has no effect in the other notifiers.
...
> +static int __init panic_notifier_filter_setup(char *buf)
> +{
> + char *func;
> + unsigned long addr;
> +
> + if (!buf)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + while (buf) {
> + func = strsep(&buf, ",");
Don't we have a parser of this format already?
Anyway, you may reduce code by
unsigned long addr;
char *func = buf;
while ((func = strsep(&func, ",")) {
> + addr = kallsyms_lookup_name(func);
> +
> + if (!addr) {
> + pr_info("panic_notifier_filter: invalid symbol %s\n", func);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (panic_nf_count < PANIC_NF_MAX) {
> + panic_nf_functions[panic_nf_count] = addr;
> + panic_nf_count++;
> + pr_debug("panic_notifier_filter: added symbol %s\n", func);
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("panic_notifier_filter: exceeded maximum notifiers (%d), aborting\n",
> + PANIC_NF_MAX);
> + panic_nf_count = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("panic_notifier_filter", panic_notifier_filter_setup);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 20:00 [PATCH V2] notifier/panic: Introduce panic_notifier_filter Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-01-06 20:25 ` Alan Stern
2022-01-06 21:05 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-01-07 12:08 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-01-07 14:39 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdgtNvd68kWakErr@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox