From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "chenhaixiang (A)" <chenhaixiang3@huawei.com>
Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Louhongxiang <louhongxiang@huawei.com>,
"wangbin (A)" <wangbin224@huawei.com>,
"Fangchuangchuang(Fcc,Euler)" <fangchuangchuang@huawei.com>,
lihuafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
"wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Question about Address Range Validation in Crash Kernel Allocation
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:09:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfvdFxR40Duh037w@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45065451d7d343679e150313c1ee2b62@huawei.com>
On 03/21/24 at 03:22am, chenhaixiang (A) wrote:
> I'm sorry for the delay. Here are some details from the boot log and /proc/iomem:
> The Boot log:
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0 (root@localhost.localdomain) (gcc (GCC) 10.3.1, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.37) #3 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 20 11:46:11 UTC 2024
> [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.8.0 root=/dev/mapper/root ro crashkernel=512M resume=/dev/mapper/swap rd.lvm.lv=root rd.lvm.lv=swap crash_kexec_post_notifiers softlockup_panic=1 reserve_kbox_mem=16M fsck.mode=auto fsck.repair=yes panic=3 nmi_watchdog=1 quiet rd.shell=0 memblock=debug efi=debug console=ttyS0,115200n8 console=tty0
......snip...
> [ 0.022622] memblock_phys_alloc_range: 536870912 bytes align=0x1000000 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000100000000 reserve_crashkernel_generic+0x7c/0x220
> [ 0.022628] memblock_phys_alloc_range: 536870912 bytes align=0x1000000 from=0x0000000100000000 max_addr=0x0000400000000000 reserve_crashkernel_generic+0x7c/0x220
> [ 0.022632] memblock_reserve: [0x000000c01f000000-0x000000c03effffff] memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xee/0x170
> [ 0.022634] memblock_phys_alloc_range: 268435456 bytes align=0x1000000 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000100000000 reserve_crashkernel_generic+0x11d/0x220
> [ 0.022638] memblock_reserve: [0x0000000049000000-0x0000000058ffffff] memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xee/0x170
> [ 0.022640] crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x49000000 - 0x59000000 (256 MB)
> [ 0.022641] crashkernel reserved: 0x000000c01f000000 - 0x000000c03f000000 (512 MB)
Here, crashkernel,low is reserved in region: [0x49000000 - 0x59000000] (256 MB)
crashkernel,high is reserved in region: [0x000000c01f000000 - 0x000000c03f000000] (512 MB)
......
> [ 0.029839] memblock_reserve: [0x000000c03ffff740-0x000000c03fffff7f] memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xee/0x170
> [ 0.029843] e820: update [mem 0x53cbd000-0x53ccffff] usable ==> reserved
> [ 0.029861] TSC deadline timer available
Then here, region [0x53cbd000-0x53ccffff] is reserved in e820, and print
abvoe "usable ==> reserved". This should be the step which prevents earlier
reserved crashkernel,low from being added to iomem tree. I am not sure
what triggered the e820 update.
How do you boot into your new 6.8.0 kernel? Used kexec -l to jump into
the 2nd kernel, or reboot from bios/firmware boot up into 6.8.0?
Reverting below commit should fix your problem, can you try it?
commit 4a693ce65b186fddc1a73621bd6f941e6e3eca21
Author: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Date: Fri Dec 29 16:02:13 2023 +0800
kdump: defer the insertion of crashkernel resources
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <45065451d7d343679e150313c1ee2b62@huawei.com>
2024-03-21 7:09 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-03-21 9:17 Question about Address Range Validation in Crash Kernel Allocation chenhaixiang (A)
2024-03-21 9:48 ` Li Huafei
2024-03-21 10:06 ` Dave Young
2024-03-21 12:37 ` Li Huafei
2024-03-22 1:16 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-22 7:26 ` Dave Young
2024-03-22 7:18 ` Dave Young
2024-03-22 7:58 ` Li Huafei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-20 13:12 chenhaixiang (A)
2024-03-20 14:08 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-19 7:24 chenhaixiang (A)
2024-03-19 8:21 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-18 12:00 chenhaixiang (A)
2024-03-19 1:38 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfvdFxR40Duh037w@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhaixiang3@huawei.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=fangchuangchuang@huawei.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangbin224@huawei.com \
--cc=wanghai38@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox