From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD2AC83F09 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 05:39:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=AgGo0D6w/UsINXs2Wle7uc8mU/aFWH/QOKQE3QW+Hgk=; b=G3aLJ9dF4pHTv7ALUNXJ4lrueM DoWtsxVzbalc8vWFdYFhcmJq0+m2DVQvN/4Iv78V3Ke5qE2Q+/I5I/h5SM8qPDWq2lOfWW7eFJ+6p OWOWCGKkxg8pGf0+OmToOeIHEK1qlTioMYbn/+jzvpxJAQI2qyhCWHYhknSNTglnZBP3b3Ddgqn3E pR/whlBZ3bJJhwAgeR0U4aABFGkR+yTZ+wYocoL7Yvzl1ZMP8DIO7C7VL5DOx8yezMawGR/68yCgf jG8k4nluL1wNrAti1TpgsqMDro5zbPnjrN/9lSQ5QOt98gqj8tlvgBJpRHeXAYpiqcFJ1Ukq3Hv5y QjtvUgHA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uZNWh-00000007bYx-3JgI; Wed, 09 Jul 2025 05:39:27 +0000 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uZNWe-00000007bYH-1T6J for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2025 05:39:25 +0000 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id DE9F61C00B2; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:39:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucw.cz; s=gen1; t=1752039562; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AgGo0D6w/UsINXs2Wle7uc8mU/aFWH/QOKQE3QW+Hgk=; b=Iod5xTBHZgdsUmi51ar9v5dLDyhumMRHF8uBR4dIFbZ+ES0dYu7ki4ZhoaDGPmY90IP/DA CkV1368WIXJKNOOIzFy0W16xRNktUAbJ2ZruolHwgA7Fy4N4W54g35tmUf3VIcYjnsrHVD R5W7pldd1tuedKl6w6PruHRYq4chheE= Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:39:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Sasha Levin Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello , Nat Wittstock , Lucian Langa , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 6/8] PM: Restrict swap use to later in the suspend sequence Message-ID: References: <20250708000215.793090-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20250708000215.793090-6-sashal@kernel.org> <87ms9esclp.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87tt3mqrtg.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WlasF0qNpP9A3mRg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250708_223924_710597_2962F29D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.26 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --WlasF0qNpP9A3mRg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > In this instance I honestly haven't read the LLM explanation. I agree > with you that the explanation is flawed, but the patch clearly fixes a > problem: >=20 > "On AMD dGPUs this can lead to failed suspends under memory > pressure situations as all VRAM must be evicted to system memory > or swap." >=20 > So it was included in the AUTOSEL patchset. Is "may fix a problem" the only criteria for -stable inclusion? You have been acting as if so. Please update the rules, if so. > > I assume going forward that AUTOSEL will not consider any patches > > involving the core kernel and the user/kernel ABI going forward. The > > areas I have been involved with over the years, and for which my review > > might be interesting. >=20 > The filter is based on authorship and SoBs. Individual maintainers of a > subsystem can elect to have their entire subsystem added to the ignore > list. Then the filter is misdesigned. BR, Pavel --=20 I don't work for Nazis and criminals, and neither should you. Boycott Putin, Trump, and Musk! --WlasF0qNpP9A3mRg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCaG4AigAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8gTIAKC/zQyWgLHgvPMd65NHV3TkdPwjRgCeIAbYyb9XFecAJ4qXIm2LIa7gI/o= =taVt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WlasF0qNpP9A3mRg--