From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B55D26284 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:44:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=VGSkGElZi1cLOojEet4P0f949OnKsvKzNEf/YSqlH4s=; b=cG+2boJBD2lp6te7Kb19qMY4F4 U3MtbXnZZHsMl4jjcrMUIWQODV3zwRvK7hU6qojZTFPx73o0SHsD5ebFpYpn51kkvA6WulosOwOWG keszyNapJYZQEMtHo4WSMVflGnowrJfh10YTfN7bGBy0DNfCtIntdLKj7/dhxtWYXJW5WZJW+Y7ls 9G9guPVBS9hJjHxWEvh5U2+nX2TZ4Ax+ih24/ARejdp4Ddhm9wz84l3A69eHJQwpnwBYJq17/KFeu m1F8g61b904Exqv7aMp44aABeJwgaaQBJQhHN6SZ3q83jsDuIV56ajmAfGxG6Fn6ZqepdMurrJ2AJ D4nNfonQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1viGiD-00000004JfX-1ln3; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:44:21 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1viGi8-00000004JfC-2uPZ for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:44:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AB443D4E; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 965E4C16AAE; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 18:44:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768934655; bh=+LEXTeoZdMHLGFiNXxSwJZf0gVNOtmF4IeqOGsRfK6U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rfna6mHD2LRS7oTOemBIwJdZafQvXxTBtjtJzov0cI2eTcGpPOxG9WzD6132eCHP7 x9MV32MZI4jUaUJTgYTtDbBBV8NGFpQtkeIrRss0itkOoX+8rlieEhajWmM/qOzj17 amnNjFssKpPSpgx1kz0SfcUbuZDuCj2rqAFs2zmDKUmSGo25kf19/PE4WuwHaKjcqd WAqLKOUi9ZOnLtdx7VUJJ6x/o/1T1d1go3OlbaRW0W+ZMgLMCFzxk6WMbUYL3YNAps vh5SGjE8mhhzYLZtfsTncHoQIshzuWqT3upKMLuEZd/uFM4y1DkE1uD0IrGoFzBmmY KnJq9N5FZYICQ== Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:44:08 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Jason Miu , Jonathan Corbet , Pasha Tatashin , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] kho/abi: add memblock ABI header Message-ID: References: <20260105165839.285270-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20260105165839.285270-7-rppt@kernel.org> <2vxzqzrkckkv.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2vxzqzrkckkv.fsf@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260120_104416_759928_89E41D62 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.20 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 04:31:12PM +0000, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > + * reserved_mem node: > > + * These nodes describe all reserve_mem regions. > > + * > > I think you should also mention that the name of the node is the name of > the map. @Andrew, can you please add this as a fixup: diff --git a/include/linux/kho/abi/memblock.h b/include/linux/kho/abi/memblock.h index fbfb2eb1b1cf..27b042f470e1 100644 --- a/include/linux/kho/abi/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/kho/abi/memblock.h @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ * Identifies the overall memblock ABI version. * * reserved_mem node: - * These nodes describe all reserve_mem regions. + * These nodes describe all reserve_mem regions. The node name is the name + * defined by the user for a reserve_mem region. * * - compatible: "reserve-mem-v1" * > Other than this, > > Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav Thanks! > -- > Regards, > Pratyush Yadav -- Sincerely yours, Mike.