From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F92D31A06 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 02:41:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=r6VtkOf5dPkBnW5vdgjj+TjeM5tElsvDFyqS2is6PaA=; b=NsrgOjZ9YeQOLuy7cxiVIXip5q uJD6PznNBOoyMuxWbxHTvnzX2izQ+9osiZrnoSl4aX/ou42ycNt19PDGrmxgTetEy+OsWHzlTuFZy ovcYn2WbNsGAJOA7Vqfu5WO1PDfTlZYynAMQvt/XYtI5En+2XwCgy7xW7GGrXazcZKW2/bQAeBAl/ 8ZaanVHW7Mt353tr0FSLSDgBBCAFEs514TJGpcHzlN3+jSNLes+6qAmF+gXLZ50p1oAHUvBDnT/KQ +4emOG/x3PzdfiJUfw5qzKZm4ednIfcAakA0KOMuMCewQLtfkluaPg8IBhLVHppuRNlyEnxx0LuOd SODcc9rA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vfqoh-0000000800i-2EHG; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 02:41:03 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vfqoe-0000000800O-27uL for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 02:41:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768358459; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r6VtkOf5dPkBnW5vdgjj+TjeM5tElsvDFyqS2is6PaA=; b=KfLgIj26bUT25VNyTKdIYti8LPl40NO0MRWob99Zuu+4S3Z6DXs/T3gxMTluli3dXquZQT VMQBQ5BwlZc2Oua2Ez7b6SYCMArwPjZtsT89hTH9tkRshhaRfgU7S3//9cP5lW9YO4MY0o k18KF5/9I0ycWx6tE64xwqRJ47Q1GQ0= Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-186-1kzhIM1JPJWDAVFuKIjHHQ-1; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:40:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1kzhIM1JPJWDAVFuKIjHHQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1kzhIM1JPJWDAVFuKIjHHQ_1768358455 Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-81c68fef4d4so11266294b3a.2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:40:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768358454; x=1768963254; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r6VtkOf5dPkBnW5vdgjj+TjeM5tElsvDFyqS2is6PaA=; b=WC0kQXq/s626Vyww9fojmVXZJswLooaj+fXci7vv1GbypjC9G0O495UeNL38/O0+Wv bKukIoOLIK4l/G4XS/Uq186I+fHDiCmKH73bPl9ZCsv587YA6njUtK/r3bwm+NPenLW9 wR7mPAFldFYpVNTXri66P+sHeKf9gUsBmJswbtT/DHb25v5N45As57MBY0nNKui5E594 ZgxG4vNF2KJ3chMuR+9cMy1sgILI1s7O1ds0dSK3dWom/+iaFMfD7DMXBXEjDNKjvDbn 8pP0qQ2otY4bh4s8iDFdRlU3HzdR9ytYim+L/S+z8BmDCk0jj6RH3vCUwQCQ6aEzdA30 h9LA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwUJnqLsKSZVxZXVU0CVU/n8uccZQZi08gt+BIvM+/hO2xbeoNf Ifm9Bhg6+19n88zAMtVOPBVnN8g93sHkN9S3FJtbNK170mymDfG8rttmA8MKki4FX55yEaiIpVh BI4mVh3lmQF2le1BFe8AIzw79QpL2iwqtx95JJr6GC/GzI136jc/Da9ovRiPka6tdSlcQWF/O X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX7sEaQZE2MB2AWXLTzdSk6fTr27VNWGjhZ+yLbuId1TjdHKF1vZdiF3ggWlvDS yNYeX27EADaZa3oq/jOgMZA4Q/Mb5aKGCuncamUdGdaVjVAhn5g5vzm24h9bofxk4DU+nkL/iyH x7bXJO0pcW2bmbc9jWu/lG4duMmhfovGzTXJIqyrw5pzGG6hevCh5hdRGa33PpQdm6dCVhangW/ Z4oDY3HxkA/UMwugGJrue46cpkxYQio/ixXiPT0WWAzuReRxZuC3RfxF2nyNJeCvaw8ixKM/ivg diGlLOKbs0+aquFzdwyEkVY6yHUACUEPMxg9ZN4xXsZd3/aEnbFIZEc/4tcbgQ632QiFfCHagRO m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4386:b0:81f:3e3e:c1fd with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-81f81cdee95mr966142b3a.5.1768358454354; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:40:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4386:b0:81f:3e3e:c1fd with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-81f81cdee95mr966119b3a.5.1768358453860; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([209.132.188.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-81ce881512asm6066366b3a.19.2026.01.13.18.40.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:40:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:36:52 +0800 From: Coiby Xu To: Borislav Petkov Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Message-ID: References: <20260106095100.656292-1-coxu@redhat.com> <20260109201142.GFaWFg_kR8eW48CpUp@fat_crate.local> <20260113142733.GKaWZWVR_0Q_awGa80@fat_crate.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20260113142733.GKaWZWVR_0Q_awGa80@fat_crate.local> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: DdGBK-32u_44SLYTROZ0Jt1KWCKz61bJp_AqRM78YFM_1768358455 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260113_184100_641110_07D57D3D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.40 ) X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: >> I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary >> for this case. > >Right, especially if the two patches do one logical thing - removing >__set_memory_prot(). Then one patch is better. I see, thanks for the explanation! > >> Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit >> message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no >> need for me to re-send your new patch as v2? > >Yap, I can queue it, no need. Great, thanks for taking care of the patch! > >Thx. > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > -- Best regards, Coiby