* [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot
@ 2026-01-06 9:50 Coiby Xu
2026-01-06 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] Reapply "x86/mm: Remove unused __set_memory_prot()" Coiby Xu
2026-01-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-06 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kexec, x86
Cc: Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin,
open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)
set_memory_p has been introduced since commit 030ad7af9437 ("x86/mm:
Regularize set_memory_p() parameters and make non-static"). There is no
need to use __set_memory_prot.
Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
index 201137b98fb8..0590d399d4f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
@@ -673,10 +673,7 @@ static void kexec_mark_dm_crypt_keys(bool protect)
if (protect)
set_memory_np((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages);
else
- __set_memory_prot(
- (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr),
- nr_pages,
- __pgprot(_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NX | _PAGE_RW));
+ set_memory_p((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages);
}
}
base-commit: 7f98ab9da046865d57c102fd3ca9669a29845f67
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] Reapply "x86/mm: Remove unused __set_memory_prot()" 2026-01-06 9:50 [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-06 9:50 ` Coiby Xu 2026-01-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Borislav Petkov 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-06 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kexec, x86 Cc: Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, Andy Lutomirski, Peter Zijlstra, open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) This reverts commit e1e6cd01d93359e22be84a23c8bb24ee4e04e142 as __set_memory_prot is unsued (again) after set_memory_p is used instead for x86_64 kdump LUKS support (CONFIG_CRASH_DM_CRYPT). Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h | 2 -- arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 13 ------------- 2 files changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h index 61f56cdaccb5..8d9f1c9aaa4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm-generic/set_memory.h> -#include <asm/pgtable.h> #define set_memory_rox set_memory_rox int set_memory_rox(unsigned long addr, int numpages); @@ -38,7 +37,6 @@ int set_memory_rox(unsigned long addr, int numpages); * The caller is required to take care of these. */ -int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot); int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int _set_memory_wc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int _set_memory_wt(unsigned long addr, int numpages); diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c index 6c6eb486f7a6..40581a720fe8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c @@ -2145,19 +2145,6 @@ static inline int cpa_clear_pages_array(struct page **pages, int numpages, CPA_PAGES_ARRAY, pages); } -/* - * __set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed - * a pgprot_t value from upper layers and a reservation has already been taken. - * If you want to set the pgprot to a specific page protocol, use the - * set_memory_xx() functions. - */ -int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot) -{ - return change_page_attr_set_clr(&addr, numpages, prot, - __pgprot(~pgprot_val(prot)), 0, 0, - NULL); -} - int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages) { /* -- 2.52.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot 2026-01-06 9:50 [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Coiby Xu 2026-01-06 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] Reapply "x86/mm: Remove unused __set_memory_prot()" Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-09 20:11 ` Borislav Petkov 2026-01-13 10:14 ` Coiby Xu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-01-09 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Coiby Xu Cc: kexec, x86, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 05:50:58PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > set_memory_p has been introduced since commit 030ad7af9437 ("x86/mm: > Regularize set_memory_p() parameters and make non-static"). There is no > need to use __set_memory_prot. > > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) Why aren't those a single patch? --- From: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:50:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p() instead of __set_memory_prot() set_memory_p() is available to use outside of its compilation unit since: 030ad7af9437 ("x86/mm: Regularize set_memory_p() parameters and make non-static"). There is no use for __set_memory_prot() anymore so drop it too. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260106095100.656292-1-coxu@redhat.com --- arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h | 1 - arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 5 +---- arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 13 ------------- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h index 61f56cdaccb5..4362c26aa992 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ int set_memory_rox(unsigned long addr, int numpages); * The caller is required to take care of these. */ -int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot); int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int _set_memory_wc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int _set_memory_wt(unsigned long addr, int numpages); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c index 201137b98fb8..0590d399d4f1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c @@ -673,10 +673,7 @@ static void kexec_mark_dm_crypt_keys(bool protect) if (protect) set_memory_np((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages); else - __set_memory_prot( - (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), - nr_pages, - __pgprot(_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NX | _PAGE_RW)); + set_memory_p((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages); } } diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c index 6c6eb486f7a6..40581a720fe8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c @@ -2145,19 +2145,6 @@ static inline int cpa_clear_pages_array(struct page **pages, int numpages, CPA_PAGES_ARRAY, pages); } -/* - * __set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed - * a pgprot_t value from upper layers and a reservation has already been taken. - * If you want to set the pgprot to a specific page protocol, use the - * set_memory_xx() functions. - */ -int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot) -{ - return change_page_attr_set_clr(&addr, numpages, prot, - __pgprot(~pgprot_val(prot)), 0, 0, - NULL); -} - int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages) { /* -- 2.51.0 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot 2026-01-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Borislav Petkov @ 2026-01-13 10:14 ` Coiby Xu 2026-01-13 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-13 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Borislav Petkov Cc: kexec, x86, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 09:11:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 05:50:58PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: >> set_memory_p has been introduced since commit 030ad7af9437 ("x86/mm: >> Regularize set_memory_p() parameters and make non-static"). There is no >> need to use __set_memory_prot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > >Why aren't those a single patch? Hi Borislav, I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary for this case. Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no need for me to re-send your new patch as v2? > >--- >From: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> >Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:50:58 +0800 >Subject: [PATCH] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p() instead of __set_memory_prot() > >set_memory_p() is available to use outside of its compilation unit since: > > 030ad7af9437 ("x86/mm: Regularize set_memory_p() parameters and make non-static"). > >There is no use for __set_memory_prot() anymore so drop it too. > > [ bp: Massage commit message. ] > >Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> >Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> >Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260106095100.656292-1-coxu@redhat.com >--- > arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h | 1 - > arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 5 +---- > arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 13 ------------- > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h >index 61f56cdaccb5..4362c26aa992 100644 >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h >@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ int set_memory_rox(unsigned long addr, int numpages); > * The caller is required to take care of these. > */ > >-int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot); > int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); > int _set_memory_wc(unsigned long addr, int numpages); > int _set_memory_wt(unsigned long addr, int numpages); >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >index 201137b98fb8..0590d399d4f1 100644 >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c >@@ -673,10 +673,7 @@ static void kexec_mark_dm_crypt_keys(bool protect) > if (protect) > set_memory_np((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages); > else >- __set_memory_prot( >- (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), >- nr_pages, >- __pgprot(_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NX | _PAGE_RW)); >+ set_memory_p((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(start_paddr), nr_pages); > } > } > >diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >index 6c6eb486f7a6..40581a720fe8 100644 >--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c >@@ -2145,19 +2145,6 @@ static inline int cpa_clear_pages_array(struct page **pages, int numpages, > CPA_PAGES_ARRAY, pages); > } > >-/* >- * __set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed >- * a pgprot_t value from upper layers and a reservation has already been taken. >- * If you want to set the pgprot to a specific page protocol, use the >- * set_memory_xx() functions. >- */ >-int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot) >-{ >- return change_page_attr_set_clr(&addr, numpages, prot, >- __pgprot(~pgprot_val(prot)), 0, 0, >- NULL); >-} >- > int _set_memory_uc(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > { > /* >-- >2.51.0 > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > -- Best regards, Coiby ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot 2026-01-13 10:14 ` Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-13 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2026-01-14 2:36 ` Coiby Xu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-01-13 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Coiby Xu Cc: kexec, x86, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: > I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary > for this case. Right, especially if the two patches do one logical thing - removing __set_memory_prot(). Then one patch is better. > Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit > message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no > need for me to re-send your new patch as v2? Yap, I can queue it, no need. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot 2026-01-13 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov @ 2026-01-14 2:36 ` Coiby Xu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Coiby Xu @ 2026-01-14 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Borislav Petkov Cc: kexec, x86, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, H. Peter Anvin, open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote: >> I thought smaller patches are easier to review. But seems it's unnecessary >> for this case. > >Right, especially if the two patches do one logical thing - removing >__set_memory_prot(). Then one patch is better. I see, thanks for the explanation! > >> Thanks for squashing the two commits and also updating the commit >> message! I notice you also added a Link tag. Does it mean there is no >> need for me to re-send your new patch as v2? > >Yap, I can queue it, no need. Great, thanks for taking care of the patch! > >Thx. > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > -- Best regards, Coiby ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-14 2:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-01-06 9:50 [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Coiby Xu 2026-01-06 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] Reapply "x86/mm: Remove unused __set_memory_prot()" Coiby Xu 2026-01-09 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/crash: Use set_memory_p instead of __set_memory_prot Borislav Petkov 2026-01-13 10:14 ` Coiby Xu 2026-01-13 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2026-01-14 2:36 ` Coiby Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox