From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1024010854D7 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:34:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=CEeNeGSuoJbwavsVGKqIrrGpZX/tRWL23KECmmLaw5o=; b=bDg2F2bWPxpaP1UlMOzW82MSQh fp95JUtRx9vF0zk7P1LLYXmocJle7RtOmf2mehAQtGPy/+Ua3QSHKraWrBNpkJVk5jF0A69yk4tvK djkiP7Z1PzPY+k/S6dbRyibg7Qou9LzW3E4qXgPXrcPY5W0rMDEUdtJ+kFJi2bGZSnOcGEzQb3H6W ILdS2JQQ24t+zf+UhSUpUAyqC44SLl/FmZ5oB1Ee9kdbs8bB3l0mlmzQqQbZkYoJxG3JWV5+vVKdk IEUmEnNGIHITlHvi/lB8kV53GUdQ7qXue5/rmhNOtAussYvP/FciOmrxNEYOYN2jcTA4167WgvCz+ NaeBzUxw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w2nI9-000000089SR-0fIc; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:34:17 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w2nI7-000000089S7-2kyF for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:34:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF58160131; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 834DCC19421; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773826454; bh=RNmLphyfgBoFzN7pwRjKveGHVFoZvoAzSTPSlQqJSbc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qamBkgFmmvA2Gb1XpCOtLpa/pLT/8rI3SHSEPpp2OkOt5UqDx2qZT/QqYKxDgrx2N auNVEDZQD45erneLBRq49YfmhkuK5IdkzUk2TUbiYSIN2Zgjj9jau8jp/2obyC1mlt oiDCcn9ALby+qpo0uT2L18eWQqJy3pzpNQPrydq7ZbLA+B3GHaJ5KWHfS89obCvnvq ZrNeEA9QqK6WY/l3FE9ahaKbNWHy99ZlxS0hcpwUnQMDVYBgBM3bsPBLYL2b1SekYN sXCLHta8bd6bDdmYU9TPJnuA114W3jzhAU+OFP3XBQTOMiDMgACy9H3dKiD5v54H4X zdUI6ziOS0f+g== Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:34:07 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Clapinski , Evangelos Petrongonas , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Alexander Graf , Samiullah Khawaja , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] kho: add support for deferred struct page init Message-ID: References: <20260317141534.815634-1-mclapinski@google.com> <20260317104625.fd6a006871dcceaceafe990b@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260317104625.fd6a006871dcceaceafe990b@linux-foundation.org> X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 10:46:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:15:31 +0100 Michal Clapinski wrote: > > > When CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT (hereinafter DEFERRED) is > > enabled, struct page initialization is deferred to parallel kthreads > > that run later in the boot process. > > > > Currently, KHO is incompatible with DEFERRED. > > This series fixes that incompatibility. > > Thanks, I've added this series to mm.git's mm-new branch for testing. > All being well I'll move it into the mm-unstable branch (and hence > linux-next) in a few days. All being well I'll move it into the > non-rebasing mm-stable branch a few weeks hence. Then into mainline > during the merge window! > > [1/3] and [2/3] aren't showing any review at this time, but the They keep changing because of review comments, that's why there still no tags for them, > well-reviewed [3/3] is the meat of this series. -- Sincerely yours, Mike.