From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF4B0C43458 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:08:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=vIMzUuxHxFqL8tOXSXuVtk8D0W+fd0ZANh/QBRHFHHI=; b=RwQXgJi5qbqaAZIjvr6+V4oIk5 tb8vymzHxwHzVkByPGILr0zG3cDtulCJ7VdC7vJUuRvJPLqC/KMxNwr6f9aZvNBm5b8zNq7jrRYnj 7BeV2arTCWXVWZ+ok42q7bRn2f61mRxmq0ENPKga5JvJkk713dNEovnA5fgwfEutLxNzYXyTZJh+M gjjl8po11Hye6m4vEoTnQD7XNlxYZlWjRBDWvEVMIBBFSOGnh1T90DCFaJ1xGAcikiDn5B8r6MBfd PN7oKiOjcZNNfbENx058TSGLQTHFs1hbrW243JhRPxOnOem/xPRkjkzzNxcu6v5ndVckn1YUFPDtx gl2cgbFw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wjCeO-00000008fam-2CZU; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:08:32 +0000 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wjCeL-00000008fa1-0RTw; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:08:30 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=vIMzUuxHxFqL8tOXSXuVtk8D0W+fd0ZANh/QBRHFHHI=; b=v/8ZV28mhk4Znb0EaOx+s2TQ1P 7uFqyX3EdHVxCGK1z1oFiZjknx/V4nVGCDWxKAtqnqU2gIceJQ69YmnZP8NKErapRfQTeRP++IgVk 7P+o6z+lYns7OYc2/fHcj7zeq7SGVsfBCqQ3A0twGLNbNMtcoV+Rux9t+Z94lOSB/DkXFSdH9yBIz L7t7mJcwNPx065+Vf5TWTWSiq7kvMs3C0nqF1kxB5mAjqDq+OhcgSkirWSF6eBR52gmRMDWw60zit 82Oz2yrTj0K8QgCJBhNsvBWNywoCcjEJ4af9Borx51vVn69SafKApITNI0IP5cs1jD9Lmqqxcm49j TzXFyhTw==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wjCe4-001OGg-2n; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:08:13 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:08:08 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Baoquan He Cc: Baoquan He , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dyoung@redhat.com, tony.luck@intel.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, zhiquan1.li@intel.com, olja@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vmcoreinfo: expose hardware error recovery statistics via sysfs Message-ID: References: <20260202-vmcoreinfo_sysfs-v2-0-8f3b5308b894@debian.org> <20260202-vmcoreinfo_sysfs-v2-1-8f3b5308b894@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: leitao X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260713_020829_140501_5D4455F9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.81 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:03:07PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > Anyway, I am glad to see it's been taken out of vmcoreinfo.c, > which is going in the right way from kdump side. For its migrating > into driver folder, leave it to the relevant reviewer to review and > decide. On that patch, If you could confirm that moving it away from vmcoreinfo is the preferred approach, that would help establish consensus around the right direction. Thanks, --breno