From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:15:39 +1100 (AEDT) From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add support for arm64 to carry ima measurement In-Reply-To: <0053eb68-0905-4679-c97a-00c5cb6f1abb@arm.com> Message-ID: References: <20191011003600.22090-1-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <87d92514-e5e4-a79f-467f-f24a4ed279b6@arm.com> <0053eb68-0905-4679-c97a-00c5cb6f1abb@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: James Morse Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, sboyd@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, prsriva , takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, duwe@lst.de, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, allison@lohutok.net, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, James Morse wrote: > > The IMA logs are event logs for module load time signature validation(based on policies) > > which are backed by the TPM. No SecureBoot information is present in the log other than > > the boot aggregate. > > Okay, so SecureBoot is optional with this thing. Correct. Verified boot is one alternative. -- James Morris _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec